the question is so simple, whose KO was more impressive? people try to change it to whose KO was more meaningful just to justify their vote to mayweather. i you watch both KOs, you'll definitely see that Pac's was more impressive. Though i believe that Floyd's KO was more meaningful on the premise that he's the first to do it to Ricky.
Pac's was more impressive. But Floyd's placement was exemplary. He had him seeing stars. This content is protected This content is protected
Pacquiao , easily. He not only knocked him the **** out , he completely shut him down throughout the fight. Funny enough, Pacquiao actually countered Hatton better then Floyd did. He must of hit Hatton with like 30 counter right hooks.
Hatton looked like he was going to hell to meet Satan for good when he was knocked the ****in **** out by Pacquaio. Pac's KO obviously.
The check hook by FMJ was a thing of beauty, but the powerful knock-out by Pac was also equally impressive.
i don't know, but funny how people here rate mayweather over pac KO and reasons that mayweather tire him out first and then banged hatton's head to the pillar when pac didn't takeatsch 10 rounds to knock him out cold
You pretty much nailed it, but thinking who's was more "meaningful" depends on how highly regarded you held Hatton in the first place. If you never thought much of Hatton, Pac's KO was more meaningful AND more impressive, but if you held Hatton in high regard, then Floyd's was more meaningful because he did it first, and he did it when Hatton was undefeated, but I don't see how anyone can think PBF's KO was more...eye candy, for lack of a better term...
No brainer. Unless you mean Floyd because of his low KO ratio. But if you are asking who laid the KTFO on Hatton then Pac.
it all depends on personal preference... but anyways, i voted for pac's because it was more devastating...