Thanks! Johnson has really grown on me as I used to place hime around 8-11, but think there is so much more to him than I used to. I can't envision him any lower than 6th really.
Does anyone else have a top 20-25 list for a comparrison???? And SuzieQ said they rate Liston higher than most...who are the ones you tend to rate higher than many or in reverse seem to rate lower than most!
Why? He beat Floyd Patterson 2x, Cleveland Williams 2x, Eddie Machen, and Zora Folley. All of these men were in their primes. All of these men could have been highly competitive in any era with the talents they showcase on film. Patterson is typically ranked among top 20 heavyweights of all time(you rank him # 14), while Machen Folley and Williams usually get placed in the top 50. Liston also beat a solid list on 2nd tier contenders like Nino Valdes, Mike Dejohn, Johnny Summerlin 2x, Roy Harris, and Wayne Bethea. I think his resume was filled with both quality and quantity. What don't you like about it?
Tier 1 Joe Louis Muhammad Ali Tier 2 Rocky Marciano Tier 3 Jack Johnson Larry Holmes Lennox Lewis Tier 4 James J. Jeffries George Foreman Evander Holyfield Tier 5 Sam Langford Joe Frazier Mike Tyson Tier 6 Max Schmeling Floyd Patterson Sonny Liston Tier 7 Jack Dempsey Harry Wills Tier 8 Ezzard Charles Jersey Joe Walcott Tier 9 Bob Fitzsimmons Jack Sharkey Wladimir Klitschko Tier 0 Jim Corbett Max Baer My placements of Patterson and Schmeling may be seem to high to some but I like where they are. I´m very happy with my list these days.
Me too. I could drop Dempsey off but his legend keeps him at #10. I also think I have Holyfield #11. Liston is in that 10-12 range currently.
Not that I don't think he is a quality HW, and have no problem with any one having him in the top 10, although 5 and below seems a stretch tom (but that is merely my opinion). The fact that he only has 1 title defense, and the Ali II fight in particular sticks in my gut...To much speculation about what may or may not have happened there leave a bitter taste in my mouth...although in fairness there are a lot of shady deals throughout boxing history! I think he should have been champ before he was, had he gotten a shot sooner, and than he would clearly have more defenses. I agree he has solid names and think more highly of Williams than some others do. But why should he be rated higher than Holyfield, Lewis, Dempsey (my double standard), Frazier, Foreman etc. I don't want to diminish Liston as I think highly of him, so its more that I rate others higher than him and think the careers of Holyfield & Lewis (I use these 2 and Jeffries because they are the names that I have switched him with) have a greater depth... So pick away! This content is protected
Its a pretty good list, Though I think Bowe is a little bit high for me. I agree with MOST of the placements.
Sullivan is a bit odd since he build a part of his resume fighting without gloves. One that possibly should be included there is Peter Jackson.
Whats forgotting is Sullivan was pretty much shot by the time of Corbett and Jackson, I belive had Corbett not taking Sullivan out, Jackson would have, with out the color bar. Prime for Prime is a close call imo. But in the 1890's Sullivan was at the end of the trail, the lost to Corbett(OR Jackson in this image world) Should not affect Sullivan in rankings imo.
You know what a Tier-System is, right? And if you look a bit closely inside the tiers the fighters are ranked chronological. But aside of that, I argued in another thread that you could put Patterson above Liston, not much but a bit.
I think that's a bit much considering Liston demolished him twice. I don't think Patterson did enough else to separate himself. His reign was nothing spectacular either. Liston accused of him of ducking black fighters.
Totally depends on your criteria. I don´t rate h2h or ability when compiling a list. But I do rank achievements and Patterson scores high there with him beeing the youngest and first two time hw champ. And him fighting bigger fighters thoughout his career, having a slightly better longevity at the top evens out Liston´s wins over him. You could make arguments. I know you don´t want to see them but they are there.