Why not "winner takes all" for Wlad vs Haye?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boxfan1, Apr 14, 2010.


  1. Boxfan1

    Boxfan1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,813
    4
    Dec 17, 2005
    Winner takes 100% of the profits. If Haye really is that confident in himself, he would go for that offer. That alone could be the highest promotional tool for such a fight.
     
  2. _King_

    _King_ drunken master Full Member

    778
    0
    Apr 15, 2009
    damn gd idea man!!! Mayweather should do this too, he did say he was a prizefighter
     
  3. Boxfan1

    Boxfan1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,813
    4
    Dec 17, 2005
    I'm surprised by the lack of support for this option.
     
  4. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Wlad knows what he is worth for a fight. He won't fight for less. Why should he? Haye does have a punchers chance. Haye would NEVER do it. He already pulled out at the thought of not getting paid already, so we know his answer.
     
  5. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    No fighters, rightfully, would go for a winner takes all. I don't think it's ever happened in the history of boxing. These guys are risking their lives in there and you're expecting them to do it for free?
     
  6. C HOP

    C HOP The World Awaits Full Member

    4,158
    61
    Nov 30, 2007
    both fighters, would always have that worry if they lose, so they would just be wasting the health for absolute nothing
     
  7. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    would Wlad take it??
     
  8. C HOP

    C HOP The World Awaits Full Member

    4,158
    61
    Nov 30, 2007
    i am in favour of 60 - 40 to the winner by ko, considering that both guys claim they will knock the other out!
     
  9. keure

    keure Active Member Full Member

    893
    0
    May 9, 2009
    this is some ignorant caveman type logic, so 2 guys train for 2-3 months for a fight that they both put their lives on the line top entertain us, in a sport that literally one punch can take you from getting your ass kicked to winning by bruital ko, and they should agree to potentially get unlucky and do it for free, wow, your obviously a very simple guy who has never boxed before, theirs alot like you on this site unfortunately
     
  10. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    :deal
     
  11. AS92

    AS92 *****hole Full Member

    132
    0
    Mar 14, 2010
    Well it isn't as if they're not rich already!
     
  12. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    50/50 from the gate then Wlad takes all money from German subscribers, while Haye 100% from British
     
  13. bknystl

    bknystl Active Member Full Member

    1,267
    3
    Dec 20, 2009
    Do you know how dirty a fight would get if the odds were winner takes all?
     
  14. Boxfan1

    Boxfan1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,813
    4
    Dec 17, 2005
    Do you know how much more marketable and exciting a fight would be with both fighters agreeing to winner take all? It would also speak volumes about the fighters true intentions and guts.
     
  15. Boxfan1

    Boxfan1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,813
    4
    Dec 17, 2005
    Also, Freddie Roach proposed a winner take all fight between Pac and Mayweather. Or has he not been around boxing long enough to make that kind of offer?