How highly do you rate Tommy Loughran?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by PhillyPhan69, Apr 16, 2010.


  1. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,107
    15,591
    Dec 20, 2006
    Loughran gets some mentions from time to time, but not an extroidinary ammount. How high do you rank him compared to other LHW and does he fit into your top 100 atg's overall????
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,748
    29,133
    Jun 2, 2006
    Easily top 6 at LH ,and certainly in my 100 ATG's.
     
  3. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    19
    Nov 11, 2005
    Top 10 at 175 without a doubt.
     
  4. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,107
    15,591
    Dec 20, 2006
    Out of curiosity who do you rate above him there
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,748
    29,133
    Jun 2, 2006
    Probably only.
    1.Tunney.
    2.Charles.
    3.Moore.
    4.Foster.
    The top two are interchangeable imo.
    After these it would be something like.
    5.Loughran
    6.Conn
    7.Spinks.
    8.Delaney
    9.Johnson.
    10.Jones.

    Greb and Langford should be in the mix but where, I don't know?
    Choose a spot.
     
  6. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,725
    3,565
    Jul 10, 2005
    Any were under Jack Delaney imo.

    Loughran was never able to turn that lost to a win in the rematch.
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Sure, but according to many sources Loughran beat Tunney, despite only being a teenager at the time. Tunney, ironically, never rematched Loughran. Beating Tunney is more signifigant than beating Delaney.

    I like Harold Johnson over Loughran. He seemed to me a more complete version of Tommy, with an even better left jab.
     
  8. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    He made my top 6 also. He reminds me of a matador.
     
  9. MrMarvel

    MrMarvel Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,792
    15
    Jan 29, 2009
    He was a truly great fighter.
     
  10. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    157
    Mar 4, 2009
    Loughran was more fleet-footed, perhaps a bit tougher and craftier with the old time tricks, Harold was more technically sound.

    Tunney vs Loughran was apparently a close fight at an early stage in their careers. I don't really count it as a win for either. Unfortunately they never fought again. I believe Loughran was the more willing of the two to get in the ring again. Loughran and Delaney should have also had another fight. Loughran did better against heavyweights, but Delaney employed a similar style and punched harder.
     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005

    Hey Revolver :hi:
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,601
    27,272
    Feb 15, 2006
    Loughran was an incredible fighter.

    I think that he was cleverer than Gene Tunney, and if he had Tunneys power he would have been almost unbeatable at the time.

    He gave Tunney the blueprint for beating Harry Greb.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,748
    29,133
    Jun 2, 2006
    The difference was Loughran, because of his bad hands, had allmost zero power,whereas Delaney had a natural ko right hand.
     
  14. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    157
    Mar 4, 2009
    Maybe he relied on that power too much which is why he couldn't deal with bigger heavyweights like Loughran could. Delaney also wasn't much more than a super middleweight in today's terms.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,748
    29,133
    Jun 2, 2006
    "Bright Eyes" did manage to stop,pretty big heavies like Montgomery with one right hand Ist rd. Also he kod Gorman 2rds, Rojas 4rds.