Martinez handed you your ass my friend. I suggest you stick to Florida real Estate. Pavlik stuttered and changed the subject AND DODGED THE QUESTION when asked if he would invoke the rematch clause. Mr. Williams this puts you in the drivers seat to get your ass kicked once more. Only this time............no blatant robberies. Step up!
enough with the robbery bs....Williams-Martinez was no robbery. It was no more a robbery than Calzaghe-Hopkins(which I thought Joe nipped on workrate....and pretending to hump BHOP's head lol)
Martinez shouldn't even have to give Willams a rematch in a fight he won in. i had Martinez up 116-112 in the Williams fight and after watching it 3 full times the lowest i get is 115-112 Martinez. i think it will happen for sure if Williams gets past Cintron and hopefully Martinez gets the RIGHT decision the next time.
Martinez himself also thought it was a close fight that could go either way. <<So how did Martinez whooped Williams ass????????????????
****! That fight WASN'T a robbery, it was a close fight I don't give a **** what your scorecard was, it was a CLOSE fight. ****, that **** is getting old.
I scored it for williams, forgot my card will have to watch it again......I think if Martinez shows up with this stamina like he did tonight, he will beat williams this time....
You're a ****ing dumbass that thinks Martinez whooped Williams ass in which he didn't. Martinez himself thought it was a close fight that could have gone either way. <<<Why you ignoring what Martinez said?
You obviously don't know how to score a fight. Williams alleged win over Martinez was nothing more than boxing politics. He lost that fight and got a GIFT. He'll lose the rematch in dramatic fashion. Martinez is obviously far better than credit has been given............this summarized by the beating he gave Pavlik and his role as an underdog in a fight he should have been favored. OBVIOUSLY. Whoever of you said that the Martinez vs Pavlik fight was close.............UR AN IDIOT.