And why is that? Because Brock is a better striker? Brock has better submmisions? Brock is more physically talented? No no and no. Brock with his lack of experience is hardly any different to Pudz. Its ironic that he is given more credibility than he deserves as it is only his natural talent along with some extremely shrewd match making that earnt him the UFC title. Pudz is an EXCEPTIONAL physical athlete. May be even more so than Brock. But he's a legitimate threat to any heavy purely because of his insane strength and physical athleticism. There is no other athlete past or present that competed in the strongman competitions that was even a fraction as athletic or conditioned as Pudz.
Wow Mariusz can do it all.Did you see him dancing? Imagine that beast tearing up the dancefloor on a friday night.
Its time for the p4p ballroom dancing combat sports list me thinks 1 - Mariusz Pudzinowski - GOAT by a county mile 2 - Evander Holyfield - Way past his prime but still got the moves 3 - Calzaghe/Liddel (cant chose between the two) Have I forgotten anyone?
Because Brock is faster, better wrestler and has beaten top fighters in UFC. Pudzianowski has had one fight against guy who was scared to death and he looked slow in that fight. I know I would put my money on the guy, who has proven himself.
Top fighters? Seriously Brocks competition is woefully flattering at best. 4 wins and now his proven himself? Get out of here with that bull****. Brocks "skill" certainly didnt win him any of his fights. His physical size strength and natural athleticism did. Is that any different to Pudz? Not in my eyes.