Wilfred Benitez .Vs. Pipino Cuevas

Oh for sure, Hamsho, Moore, Hilton, all far better than SRL, Hearns, Duran etc. Great post Red Dog

 

They beat him too. In fact, SRL won that fight easy so did Hearns. Duran was too fat and lacked the fire. I saw the fight on youtube, there is no "genius" involved in beating Duran. Duran just didnt have it, that's why he lost to Laing later in the year. 25 is young. Stop making excuses, you look like a bonehead

 

You want to see real boxing look at Hagler-Sibson or Hagler Hamsho, not that ****** with intermediate level skills

 

Wilfred Benitez is about as slippery as they come..but if Pipino Cuevas can get a glove on him..... it's all over...but that's a pretty big if

 

I like Cuevas and think highly of him, I think Cuevas beats almost anyone he can catch cleanly south of 150, that being said he doesn't catch El Radar... Benitez too slick by half in my opinion.

 

Benitez by UD. Similar to Locche vs. Fuji, although not quite THAT bad.

 

You know, everything points to Wilfred winning a decision, But, I just seem to sense Pipino landing a crushing body shot followed by a KO blow. Absolutely no reason to think Cuevas would win but...….

 

BENITEZ WIND UP KAYOING this overated fledgling