Fighter of the Decade... Who Do You Have?

You tell me why it took Calzaghe 14 years to take a fight in America?

 

I was speaking hypothetically. Of course Floyd can't make 140 today. I was saying the Floyd who fought at 140 would beat the Manny who fights at 140.

 

Pacquaio by a ****ing mile

 

So, you mean to tell me that the Bernard Hopkins and Roy Jones that Calzaghe beat are the same Hopkins/Jones from 10 years ago?

 

pacquiao has overcome the odds time and time again whilst vastly improving into a top p4p talent. thats why i rate him as fighter of the decade, floyd would be runner up based on dominance and consistency

 

no, only by a slim margin. stop being such a fanboy:-(

 

You tell my why Hopkins or Jones NEVER came to the UK to fight Calzaghe,Benn,Eubank,Watson or Collins. You tell me why Hopkins agreed to fight Calzaghe in 2002 and then pulled out waiting another 6 years until JC was 36 (well past his prime)?

 

hopkins should be getting more 2nd place votes over floyd.

 

Because Calzaghe, Benn, Eubank, Watson, and Collins (to the casual PPV buying fan) ARE NOBODIES! Why should Hopkins or Jones of went to Calzaghe? Hopkins and Jones were the NAMES. You UK dudes are delusional.

 

You mean over Pacquiao?

 

Calzaghe was NOT in his prime either. Get over it. I know you guys think there`s an unwritten law which means top American boxers always beat top European fighters and if it doesn`t happen then the defeated Yank was naturally "past his prime" or it was a full moon or his jock strap was too tight......... blah ....blah ..... blah

This content is protected

 

give up. doesn't it sink to you yet that most people have pacquiao as fighter of the past decade? i know it's hard for a joyboy like you but soon you will pass this denial stage and will soon accept the reality. :yep

 

Well see what they all say when Floyd woops Pac's ass.

 

Delusional??? From a country that elected George W Bush as their leader TWICE!!! :admin

This content is protected

 

Pac.