Which mod keeps screwing with my thread titles?

Balquiao would get knocked the **** out. If Husseins left jab had him on ***** street, a straight left from Sergio would knock his mustache off

 

:deal

 

Have your silly opinion.


But it is an outright lie to say Paul was scared to fight Martinez in a rematch. The deal was damn near done, but Martinez chose Pav instead (not a problem).


And for the record, Paul would slap the **** out of Manny. Joshua Clottey is no Paul Williams.:-(

 

but the replies you get are from pac haters.:huh i don't get what you're happy about?

 

You are only a fan of Floyd b/c you want so bad for him to beat Manny which JMM couldn't manage. Floyd definitley has a better chance at beating Manny that's for sure but it won't change the fact that Manny beat JMM twice....although he got shafted with a draw the first go round.

Martinez doesn't need a lot of power or strenght to beat a smaller man who isn't a natrual WW let alone a MW. Manny is a better boxer with better skills in my opinion. Sergio is a great athlete and boxes well but gets away with a lot.....hands down, going straight back ect....he's fast, athletic and has a good skill set, but he's not on Manny's level.

If Sergio was a WW there is no doubt Manny would win but at MW... C'mon now...Manny is not superman. It's just funny taht Manny is so good that people have to come up with reasons to rationalize why he is this good.....ROIDS, PED's, A SIDE OF MEFF!:rofl

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

Coming from someone who firmly believes that Mayweather could easily make 140 to a sudden turn-around or about face of Mayweather not wanting to make weight or does not want to undergo the process of making weight!

You have a credibility of zero, nada, ziltch.

You wrote like your word is the gospel when it comes to Mayweather, the know-it-all kind. From someone declaring without an iota of doubt that mayweather could easily make 140 without sweat to someone who is spouting another thing, Mayweather does not want to make weight.

Law of science? My ass! What do you know anbout law of Science? First look at how you defied the law of commonsense, before you even mention the law of Science.

 

Pacroid is not slow, he's Superman!

 

There are one or two people 147 lbs. or less with good speed and footwork that Pacquiao hasn't fought at the time that Pacquiao could have fought them, and that's FMJ and Raheem. Shane Mosely has great hand speed, good body movement, but I wouldn't say he has good footwork. Joan Guzman has great hand speed, great upper-body movement, but his footwork is just average in my opinion. Joel Casamayor is pass prime, and how much credit would Pac have gotten for fighting him?

 

I made those statements before Mayweather pulled what he did with Marquez.

Mayweather had never shown himself to weigh above 150, I don't see how that's assuming I know nothing.

He's cut 9lbs before. Im sorry to believe he could of made 140.



But yet you believe Pac needs 3 days to recover from mL's of blood. When that type of blood taken replenishes in an hour

 

stay in the mma forum you ignoramus...

 

Never believe any of those hypes. Paqc has reasons for not agreeing to the test and he is entitled to it. Just as Mayweather is entitled to believe that he can not defeat a "roided" Pac. I am not here to speculate whether it is right or wrong because it never changes anything.

You on the other hand put your hand in your mouth after blurting out!!!!!

You made those declarations pre weigh-in, made a resounding thud, tried to justify that thud to the point of sounding like Ellerbe by appearing like you had "inside" knowledge, then concoct another theory to not make yourself a fool.

BTW, emoticons can only help your cause if you have one. It is like highlighting, it is an art!

If you understand RBC life span, you will understand that it does not take 3 days to replenish blood losses. Where in the world did you get this 3 days figure again?

RBC has a life span of 120 days, more or less. And a senescent (meaning old, like Mosley) RBC will be sequestered by organs like Spleen, and the heme is recycled. So, technically, it takes 120 days to replace a blood loss, if it is not a massive one. Because a massive blood loss would stimulate a cascade of events to enhance RBC production, like increase EPO production in the kidneys, DPG, etc.

However, the body compensates immediately the volume loss, within a day. But not the RBC loss. Two different animals.

Like if you suffer a stab wound, your thirst center would kick-in, as well as your kidneys would decrease urine production. But you won't compensate for the cell loss, immediately.

Want another lesson in human physiology?

 

At least you don't deny that you believe Pac needs 3 days to recover. :rofl

 

Seriously, Booradley, for all the absolutely foolish and moronic things you said about Pavlik vs Martinez, all of the foregone conclusions and Martinez leaves on a stretcher bull**** you talked and obviously got blown out of the water, you're not even going to let a week go by after that humbling before having the gall to call ANYONE a "****?"

If you want to call someone a ****** so badly, you need to do what Michael said and start with the man in the mirror.

Booradley: #1 PAV-****!!!

Pavlik, after getting utterly schooled by Bernard Hopkins: "That just wasn't me in there."

Turns out it was, Kelly. Turns out it was.

 

Whatever makes you happy!!!!! As I have stated previously, the testing issue is about egos, nothing more or less. It is never about volume, timing, USADA, Tygart (a bureaucrat who actually does not do the test). Go read between the lines if you want.


However, ESBers still think it is otherwise.

BTW, blood tests are baloney. I could post articles coming from the persons who actually are doing the tests or discovered or developed the tests who would not support blood testing, as compared to a bureaucrat who would advocate blood tests.