Ingemar Johansson vs Sonny Liston

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by tommygun711, Apr 21, 2010.


  1. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    66
    Aug 18, 2009
    i still do not know but based both on their mutual opponents in patterson and machen , and liston's physical advantage , i give liston a chance of knocking johnson out in the first round but i also give johnson the chance of stopping liston later in the fight and this is based more on their non mutual opponents.
     
  2. Bad_Intentions

    Bad_Intentions Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,367
    30
    May 15, 2007
    Bad match-up.

    Liston destroys Ingemar in 4 rds atleast.
     
  3. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    98
    Feb 18, 2006
    1. I voted for Liston in this poll. I think he much the more solid fighter.

    2. "I give Ingemar a solid chance at clocking Sonny cold"

    So do I. Liston never fought anyone with a right like Ingo's and it is the right cross that a sideways fighter like Liston must worry about.
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005

    So what are you trying to say? Do you or do you not pick Liston to beat Johansson head to head?
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005

    This is irrational. Liston beat machen. Johansson lost his trilogy to patterson.
     
  6. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,557
    Nov 24, 2005
    Johansson has a puncher's chance, because his right hand was a nuke.
    But I think Liston most likely makes mincemeat of him, in quick time.
     
    choklab likes this.
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    1. Don't you think part of the reason Ingemar Johansson knocked Machen out so quickly was element of suprise? Johansson made a career out of sandbagging his opponents. Machen fought him on european soil. He was obviously ill prepared for Johansson's right hand. He had no clue going in what Johansson was all about. I think when Machen fought Williams and Liston, he knew going in their reputation as big hitters. So he was more prepared. More cautious. Now this doesn't take away from johansson victory, but it does explain why Liston and Williams were unable to knockout a "well prepared, retreating, cautious" machen.


    2. That is your subjective opinion. I think it is a mute point anyways, since it's highly likely johansson won't survive past round 5 against Liston.
     
  8. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    I think Johansson's right hand is being overrated. Yes it was a very sneaky powerful shot, but I don't think it rates up there as one of the best in history. Ive heard some say Ingo's right hand better than Rocky Marciano's Suzy Q which is preposterous. Yet when fantasy matchups are brought up between Liston and Rocky, I never hear people say "o rocky has a chance because of his right".
     
  9. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,715
    341
    Jul 12, 2007
    Yes, exactly what I mean. Even Floyd was caught unawares after almost a year had gone by. Inggo was wise in disguising his most potent weapon, and it worked-- once against Machen and once against Patterson.

    As for the theory I introduced, I don't subscribe to it myself if I'm being honest, but I'm throwing it out there anyway to gather insight as I think it's more than valid to question the victory. I realize I can only tenuously defend this at best, but it is something I'd like to explore here.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,079
    27,929
    Jun 2, 2006
    To which part of Charles anatomy are you referring ?

    Liston is a better boxer than Ingo ,hits harder with his left hook than Ingo does with his right imo,and also had a good right of his own,plus a vastly superior jab.Add a better chin, being heavier , and stronger .I see NO WAY Ingo wins this.Patterson who had a good left hook knocked INGO into a near coma,Liston would decapitate him.
     
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,855
    12,560
    Jan 4, 2008
    Ingo looks quite bad on film, frankly. But he was functional, perhaps a bit awkward as well, and has a record that suggests as much. Machen, Floyd and Cooper all looks very good me on film to me, and should be very tough opponents for anyone without a big advantage in some physical asssets, but Ingo is 3-2 against them, with all three wins coming by KO. That's not bad.

    Of course, Liston is the favourite here. Ingo's chance is to frustrate him and land that right. That could happen if it's just another fight for Liston, but if you have both guys at their very best physically and mentally it most likely won't.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  12. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Who cares if they are the same height? Liston was a genetic freak. He has a foot in reach advantage. Not to mention he hits just as hard, is more technically skilled and durable.
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005

    Cooper looks very good on film? :huh
     
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,855
    12,560
    Jan 4, 2008
    I like his perfomances against Ali. Not the most well-rounded or elegant fighter, but quick, aggressive, applies good pressure, has a good left and knows how to fight dirty. Looks like a difficult guy to meet, if not for his eyebrows. He's exactly someone I would expect to beat a fighter like Ingo, who boxes cautiously and likes to get set. But apparently...
     
  15. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    98
    Feb 18, 2006
    "Floyd was caught unawares"

    The film of the Johansson-Machen fight was shown on American TV before the Patterson fight. How could Floyd be caught unaware?

    By the way, I remember reading an article back in the early sixties about Machen and what a devotee he was of boxing films, going back to Corbett and Fitz and Jeffries and Johnson. I think it is ridiculous to assume that he would not have studed films of Johansson ko's of Ten Hoff and others. He knew Ingo had a right hand.