No idiot. I'm white. I'm Scottish. Most of the guys who post regularly on this forum are white. The reason you thnk I am black is that you are a racist who can't understand why a white guy would pick a black fighter to beat a white fighter. Race is more important to you than boxing. This is why you are totally worthless to the rest of us.
As a general rule I tend to think Frazier would struggle wil big, tall, rangy, powerpunching modern HWs, but I can see Frazier flattening Wlad.
styles make fight but I'll make my decision entirely on the size of the fighters ? :huh . . . . . . . . . . . . Im just messing with you
Wlad is not a counter puncher. And boxing is more than just size, it is about skills.Frazier had disadvantages in size his whole career, he just beat them bigger guys up.Show some respect, this is a guy who handed Ali his first loss for christ sake.
Wtf are you talking about?Frazier has a granit chin, took punches all his career and just kept coming, relentless pressure ,great stamina and punch resistance, hard to catch clean. Wlad has been fighting bums compared to Frazier. Guys like Chambers dont compare to the ATG frazier.It is all relative.
All some idiots here remember is Frazier's bad night against Foreman. This is not even an argument. Wlad had bad nights too against Brewster,Sanders, Puritty. Frazier is a lot better fighter than these 3. See this argument with Foreman is BS. Some people don't know **** about boxing.
I just don't see Frazier getting to Wlad. Look at Frazier - Foreman. Frazier was knocked down a total of 8 times (6 & 2) in their fights, and "Big" George Foreman was 6′ 3″, 217lbs. Frazier 5′ 11½″ 73" reach 215 lbs KO Percentage: 73% Wlad 6′ 6½″ 81″ reach 244 lbs KO Percentage: 84% Wlad has a 7 inch height, 8 inch reach, and 29 lb weight advantage. Height, reach, and weight are NOT everything, but when you have a big, VERY SKILLED fighter such as Wladimir, they most certainly come into play. Wlad by KO.
the difference between foreman and wladimir is that foreman fought like a big man in the sense that whenever frazier got close, foreman literally pushed him away at a distance that suited him. yes, foreman was very agressive in that fight, while wladimir just clinches when fighters get up close. a complete different type of fighters, foreman and wladimir, and so obviously both would have different results against frazier. frazier most likely would of been too much for this placid wladimir klitschko.
Aren't you the one throwing a tantrum because apparently 'only black people vote for Frazier'? **** off you ****.
What does Wlad being bigger than Foreman have to do with it? Wlad is not as naturally aggressive as Foreman and does not have the true presence in terms of psychological intimidation and all out raw slugging ability to back Frazier up. Wlad could not deliver his power from low the way Foreman did. He would not go out and fight that way because quite simply he doesn't have the mental strength to back himself to get Frazier out of there.