According to this Froch only lost 3 rounds . Just goes to show how opinionated scoring a fight can be
Kessler won the first half of every round, then allowed Froch to steal one by coming in lunging and swinging like a madman. I was very disappointed he only heavily countered this ape a handful of times.
You had it 12-0 to Kessler at the start no doubt, so Froch did well. It was a close fight, that at a real push, in the UK could have been given the other way, especialy with a knock down awarded. I don't think people can moan that Kessler won, but people claiming it was a white wash, as you did from round one, is just going to wind people up. At end of round 6 the betting exchanges had Froch at 1/2 and Kessler between 2/1- 3/1, it was by no means a one sided afair. Anyway, I won a bit on Kessler.
Later start this week mate. HBO go on air at 4.15am and they're showing Angulo-Julio first. Not staying up this week, only had 3 hours sleep last two Sundays and this will finish later than usual.
icemax, going by judging criterea I gave Froch the 3rd and 5th, thats it. Others will invariably differ, nae doot, you slipper wearing twat. I will easy go through my scoring criterea and relate it to this fight if you want.
Your comment makes no sense as we all generally have different scores, thats the point I was trying to make.
I thought Kessler was up 4-2 after 6. Disapointed I didn't check the in-play running now, I was too caught up in it. First was close and maybe for Froch but then Froch really didn't do a lot and allowed himself to be pushed back and let Kessler get an easy start. I was really surprised he didn't prey on MK's doubts and start faster.
No thanks, you obviously need to be lecturing the professionals who actually scored the fight because they certainly do not agree with you.