I think Kessler won rather clearly 116-112. Difference is that Froch won his rounds very clearly while Kessler's rounds were close. Also Froch physically inflicted more damage.
I didn't see the fight but I've noticed this trend too. For example, Martinez-Williams could've gone either way yet some people believe Maravilla was "robbed".
Fishing? What you on about. I am deadly serious, why would I joke? I felt Froch controlled the fight with his jab, I admit my scoring heavily favours the ring General in a bout, taht is a recognised criterea.
Fishing? What you on about. I am deadly serious, why would I joke? I felt Froch controlled the fight with his jab, I admit my scoring heavily favours the ring General in a bout, taht is a recognised criterea.
Froch's rounds were like "ok thats def Froch's round" while Kessler's were like "hmmm both fighters did well but Kessler slightly more".
But Kessler was the ring general :nut I dunno how much you paid for it but you have taken some good **** tonight :smoke
What the **** are you talking about?? Kessler was in trouble once in that fight. Answer me this: did you watch the fight on a stream or live on a big screen tv?
I am not trolling. I definitly thought Froch won. I am not bitter, I just think justice should be served.
People get too caught up in the "ring generalship" thing. Its not a substitute for landing hard punches and is usually below effective aggression (which Kessler showed) on most referees criteria when they score a round.