The word "robbery" CANNOT be used... PERIOD!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by swedeone, Apr 24, 2010.


  1. swedeone

    swedeone Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,227
    3
    Dec 4, 2004
    C'mon people... really, use your head. The fight WAS IN DENMARK. Hello??????

    EVERYONE knew that a close fight was going to go to Kessler. It was a close fight. End of discussion.

    Now then... let's move on to Adamek/Arreola and Julio/Angulo.

    Predictions?
     
  2. swedeone

    swedeone Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,227
    3
    Dec 4, 2004
    People PLEASE... STFU with the robbery shyt. The fight was in DENMARK. What did you expect in a close fight?... a Froch decision? :rofl
     
  3. Laudrup

    Laudrup Active Member Full Member

    738
    0
    Oct 25, 2008
    Kessler won fair and square. STFU.
     
  4. TimBowe

    TimBowe New Member Full Member

    80
    0
    Oct 15, 2009
    Does anyone think it could have gone either way?
     
  5. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    Robbery! Robbey! Robbery! Robbery! Robbery! Robbery! Robbery! Robbery! Robbery! Robbery! Robbery! Robbery! Robbery! Robbery! Robbery! Robbery!

    Don't EVEN try to tell me what work I am allowed you use. :nono











    :lol:
     
  6. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    4
    Mar 4, 2006
    Very close fight, scored it a draw in the end (just with Froch catching up kate in the fight)

    Honestly think Kessler was the more tired of the two fighters in the last few rds (for example i'd have favoured Froch to stop him as opposed the other way round if it was an old school 15 rdr)

    Kessler was always going to get the nod if it was close, two of the scorecards were unrealisticly wide, the guy who had it 115-113 you can see why.