Khan Dissing Froch on Twitter

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by rockandrollstar, Apr 24, 2010.


  1. onourway

    onourway Haye KTFO1 Wlad Full Member

    5,774
    3
    Mar 31, 2008
    Urgh.

    Sounds like he's trying to be like Mayweather now.

    What a ****.
     
  2. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    You bunch of hypocrite drama queens. Maybe it was best for Khan to not say anything but **** it, he didn't do much wrong. Froch is taking little digs at Khan all the time, that's some female **** right there. Nothing wrong with criticizing Khan's game, or his performances, a lot of people did that, but you don't see Khan having a go at all of them do you? Because Froch does it in a snide, bitchy way. Like I said, the way females do it. It's ****ed up. You could sense the hapiness in his words when Khan lost to Prescott. Hell, the man even admitted he's jealous of Khan being a bigger star than him. It's a taste of his own medicine, that's all, big deal. He dishes it out all the time, now he can take some.

    You guys talk about class, so is talking **** every week about a retired boxer classy? You guys have no problem when this dude shits on Calzaghe all the time but now you talk about class? Get the **** outta here. Khan may be an immature kid but he's 23, your man is like 10 years older but no more grown up. At least Khan's being straight up and saying what he really feels. None of this taking bitchy little digs like a female, talking about how he jealous, and then saying "but I was just criticizing his performance like everybody else, I don't have a problem with him". Yeah okay.
     
  3. IronBull

    IronBull Active Member Full Member

    931
    0
    Sep 1, 2005
    you people are BLIND.

    Froch attacked Khan countless of time.... and you don't have problem with it...

    and when Khan attack back... you are horrified


    HATER!
     
  4. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    They aint blind, they know exactly what's going on but they ignore things. You'll have people justifying Froch's **** with "oh but he does it in a witty way", "oh but he's got dry humour", " oh but you're American so you don't get his humour". That's some pathetic ****, it really is. Guess what, most of Britain doesn't "get him" either, but I suppose that's Fat Micks fault right?:roll:
     
  5. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    Has he ****, you're speaking shite, prove it.
    I can find two, after Prescott and after Kotelnik, and he wasn't being insulting, stealing Hameds poster line is insulting.

    ****ing fanboys, take his dick out your mouth and open your eyes.

    You ****s make me feel ashamed to be a Khan fan, and lately, so has Khan.
     
  6. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    I'm not a Khan fan.
     
  7. ScouseLad

    ScouseLad Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,080
    0
    Jul 14, 2007
    Have you really recorded the usernames of people who back Froch when he criticises Khan and critcise Khan we he has a go at Froch?

    Thats pretty sad.
     
  8. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    Interesting.

    Then you won't mind backing up your 'attacked countless times' statement then, will you?

    I've already mentioned 1 newspaper comment after Prescott, and his comments after Kotelnik, but then these don't really count as he made comments and didn't 'attack' him.

    Others please.
     
  9. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    That attacked countless times comment was not from me but since you want the proof so much...

    "carl what's the problem between you and Khan?"

    Froch:"You mean King Khan" (laughs)= ***** move

    "I don't want to be remembered for bing rich or running people over in my Lamborghini" = refering to Khan's hitting a pedestrian= another ***** move.

    "He’s just a bit young and fragile and probably just needs a hug from the rest of Team Khan or his personal chauffeur or whatever”=more snide comments, jealous of Khan's financial success.


    ”I remember Khan’s close friends and family at ringside looked like they were having a heart attack, watching the lad getting hammered like that!" =classless



    ”Khan took him out with some fast, clean shots. But without wanting to upset King Khan again – who is this Salita fella? I’m not being derogatory but honestly, I’ve never heard of the bloke. I’d want to see an opponent at least take a shot and throw some back. I suppose it’s down to the mandatory situation that he fought Amir. Maybe I don’t follow enough boxing, but correct me if wrong, Salita was never regarded as a hot prospect. If he was any good we’d have all heard about him before he’d got to the no1 spot, wouldn’t we?”
    ”My first defence was Jermain Taylor in America which kinds of gives you an idea of a what a genuine contender should be- and whom can declare themselves ‘world class’ and therefore be qualified to get a shot at the world champion. That guy Salita had no business in there and I’d bet my house on him never getting another shot again at any belt.” =How the **** you gonna compare yourself to a 23 year old, talking bout how you fought Taylor. So ****ing what? What were you doing at 23 Carl? Does he feel so insecure about his own career that he needs to compare himself to a kid?

    "I’ve never been a big fan of Amir. He won the WBA title but it was one of the most boring fights I’ve ever seen."


    You people won't say anything unless Froch plain comes out and says "I hate Khan". This is gossping like bitches in the office type **** from Carl, but you guys will interpret it as "witty".
     
  10. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    @ero-sennin. What's Khan's age go to do with anything? If you profess to be a world champion the challengers you take on should be no different to ones you take when you're 30. If you're not prepared to do that, relinquish the belts. Now, I don't actually blame Khan for taking on Salita (it was a mando and everyone deserves a gimme) but to suggest he should be allowed to defend his belt against lesser opposition because of his age is bull**** and is what's wrong with the sport.
     
  11. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    God you dickweeds are really ****ing ******ed :patsch

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ry9iKFnJPq8[/ame]

    That was the minor blast to Khan. Saying he has no heart, no courage, no chin, no defense.

    I'll find you plenty more that are worst if you want. Next time do you research you scottish ****.
     
  12. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    I'm not saying he should be allowed to take on lesser opposition because he's younger, but the thing is this. Froch and other's will always say **** like "Froch has achieved more, he deserves more respect, Khan hasn't taken on anyone decent". Now if Froch has been in the game longer than Khan, it's likely he'll have better achievments, so it's stupid to compare the two careers like Froch is doing. Salita was a mandatory. Khan is now taking on Paulie who is decent. When Khan has been in the game as long as Froch has, he probably will have a better resume.
     
  13. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    Seriously, these alphabet belts mean **** all nowadays.

    Look at Klitcshko's


    Klitcshko will bypass a mandatory if he fights Haye. So do you want Wlad to relunquish his belt???

    There is many other examples.

    Seriously, don't be such a hypocrit.
     
  14. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Do you find it at all suspicious that Khan is being kept away from punchers?

    I don't understand your logic or how I'm a hypocrite.
     
  15. ero-sennin

    ero-sennin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,206
    1
    Jan 31, 2009
    I'm one of the few people who believe Paulie could be a tougher fight than Maidana who is a puncher but doesn't have a lot else. I'm keeping my mouth shut for now because he has a lot of time to face these dangerous guys. If in the future he still hasn't faced any big hitters then it's different.