Damn right Froch got robbed: Why are they keepin Kessler around?

And Froch did'nt??? Thats the **** posters are trying to tell you, you're trying your best to dismiss what Kessler was doing...Kessler jab and body work won him the fight...You seriously need to rewatch the fight...You may feel Froch won but it was no ****ing robber.

And you've still havent answered my question..Since you're bitching about this fight being a robbery, what do you call Froch\Dirrell???

 

I know you're crying like a *****...Kessler won!:rofl
Froch didnt do none of that **** you've posted...I have my own two eyes so I'll stick with that! Try again CAPSFUND!

 

Hendo go to covers.com the boxing and betting forum. Search for Mack05. In the last 30 or so fights I have gotten like 2 pre fight choices wrong (including last night)..I predicted Andre Ward at +1000 before this thing even started which I posted on Covers. I write articles for various boxing websites and I have won 2 national amateur bronze medals and competed in the European championships. In or out of the ring I know a sh!t lot more about boxing then you so please crawl back under the rock you came from because if you believe Froch won that fight you can't score a fight for sh!t

 

I wish we could get the dumbass thread starter to understand that.

Everytime we have a close fight...some clown ass dude like Hendo comes out and cry robbery.

They both could have did better as you stated but that still doesnt equate to a robbery as the bitchass thread starter is trying to imply!

 

When you get through typing all of this bull**** homeboy...A close fight doesnt equal a robbery...You're making a fool of yourself capsfund!:rofl

 

You have been shown up as ignorant and outclassed.

Quit being a little *****.

 

I agree with OP that i think Froch won the fight, I don't think he was robbed however.

I would have accepted a draw, or either fighter winning by split decision.

Again I agree with OP in that it looked like Kessler was missing far more of his shots than Froch was. For instance if he threw 3 jabs, he was only landing his 3rd. He had a real hard time finding his range. Froch's jab, a tool i never knew he possessed to such a degree, was landing on kessler all night. Not only was it landing on Kessler, but nearly every time it was knocking his head back.

On top of this, Froch was the most effective with the power shots, at times really stunning Kessler. I will need to watch the fight again but if I remember correctly, every time the two engaged in a toe to toe, Froch would stand and give as good as he got, then Kessler would back off, for me that was a sign of who the dominant fighter was.

Kessler was certainly flashier, but he ate jabs all night, and when the pair engaged Froch was getting the better of it. Any time Kessler did something good, Froch would march right forward and land something of his own.

However, from round 7 to 9 or 10, Froch completely shut down, these were Kessler rounds, had Froch performed well in these rounds then i think we would have a case for a robbery, as it was however, Kessler perhaps generously nicked a close fight.

 

I agree that Kessler's agression was pretty ineffective alot of the time...

But how the fk did you think Froch was gonna win a decision in Denmark, by back-peddling and being out-worked in the majority of the rounds?

What are you new?

 

Kessler may have been missing shots but you touched up on it yourself...Froch didnt do enough to make him pay for missing...Thats the whole point...Kessler did what he had to do to pull out the vicotry!

 

Yeah, He could have capitalised more. Froch lost the fight more due to himself than anything else, Kessler would have been a sucker for the straight right when he was charging in.

It was a hard fight to score to be honest. Kessler probably got the nod for coming forward more, but Froch looked like the dominant fighter to me, and so I gave close rounds to him.

 

Froch beat kessler 4 defo.