The commentary for Kessler-Froch was

True, but to be fair only round 12 out of that selection could be considered a pickem round...117-111 is a completely insane score, whatever measure you use

 

Completely disagree. I would say only 5 and 10 of that selection as clear Froch rounds, possibly 11, I have yet to rewatch though. One, three and twelve could easily be given to Kessler iirc.

That seems to be the general consensus as well.As per Bunce and Woodhall above, lots of people that had the same scores got there by different routes.

 

No idea, I haven't seen the judges cards

 

Did Tillerman score a 10=8?

 

Fair enough, but I score rounds based on what lands and not what is thrown...in Kesslers case there was a massive difference.

Does anyone know what the press row scores were? I know that Kevin Mitchell had the fight for Froch 5-4 with 3 even.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2010/apr/25/carl-froch-mikkel-kessler

 

Apparently

 

I gave the 11th to Froch.

 

If he did he must have had a 10-10 as well to get to 117-111.

 

I can't see how anybody couldn't

 

Probably the 5th, the cheating fat Belgian **** :-(

 

The most one-sided Kessler round was probably the 8th, or maybe the 6th :think

Even then no round was anywhere near a 10-8 :-(

 

Press Row Scores That I've Seen On Showtime's Footage

Michael Engaard (Danish)
115-112 Kessler

Niall Hickman (British)
116-115 Froch (Al Bernstein also scored fight the same as Hickman)

Arne Leyenberg (German)
115-113 Froch

 

No 10-8 according to Robs thread.

 

Interesting, thanks

 

I wonder where thats come from then...a friend of mine said he saw it on the US coverage