After Amir Khan's series of stupid tweets

100%

truth is Froch has what Khan really wants, the respect of US fans.

 

Haha. stop moaning you stupid lil *****. Not like Carl didn't say a lot of bull**** about Khan. You're just pissed cos ur bum buddy carl froch who fights like a mummy, lost hahahaha.

 

Does your mummy know that you are on the internet??...****ing kids

 

i think he was/is a silly boy, and it makes him seem like a complete dickhead. But he isn't that dissimilar to many 22/23 year olds you come across in every walk of life (not all though). This doesn't make me want to see him sparked though ffs. He is one of us, going into someone elses back yard. We have got to support him

 

feck off

 

:roll:

Lazarus.....

Winning and losing is a part of top level sport.

If Carl had been laid out in a round by a journeyman (ring any bells) - you'd have a right to criticise.

Given that he has had four fights running against world class opposition, winning three of them, and holds a win over the current Euro champion.... I'd suggest you log out.

 

Does your mum know you ride Carl Froch's dick? She might want to join in, ****.

 

Some immature 'tweets' are not going to stop me from supporting a fighter.

 

i think you need another hit on your crack pipe you crazy ******* :hat

 

Who had Froch fought when Amir Khan lost? Albert Rybacki? So what gave Froch to jump on Khan who is also supporting Britian and In a DIFFERENT WEIGHT DIVISION. Answer me that?

And yes a win is a win, but I personally think Carl Froch's 'world' wins were questionable. Lets face it, Taylor, Kessler weren't in their prime and Froch was given a gift decision against Dirrell, but a win is a win.

 

I will if you give me one. nutnut

 

Given that you know Froch fought Rybacki around that time - you'd also know that Dennis Inkin was supposed to be his opponent in a WBC eliminator - but he ran a mile.

Additionally, you'd also know that Froch held wins over Dodson, Magee and Reid - clearing up the best at British level before moving up.

I wouldn't say Froch's win over Taylor was debatable at all..... it was hardly a bull**** stoppage - and the Dirrell win was no more debatable than the scandalous count Khan received against Limond - remember that?

Listen, I'm neither here nor there with Khan and think he was right to leave Warren and head to the States, but let's be honest here, he needs to think before he speaks.

What did Froch say that was so offensive anyway - it was pretty much 100% true

 

They won't stop me supporting him but they were chlildish, uncalled for and have definately put me off him somewhat.

 

It doesn't bother me if Dennis Inkin ran off this planet. The fact is that Carl Froch had fought nobody himself AT THAT TIME (Khan aswell). So what gave him the right to critisise another British young fighter who is in a different weight divison. Why do it? That's why Froch doesn't have many fans. He can't stop moaning about Calzaghe, Khan etc. Why doesn't he just accept what he's got?

And I'm not talking about the Taylor stoppage. I'm saying that Taylor was well on his way to winning that on the scorecards and if Taylor IMO didn't run out of gas and made it to the end of the bell, he would have won. Check the scorecards if you want.

Yes that count could have been counted out, but it wasn't. So there's not point bringing that up.

And what did Froch say that was 100% true? Please find some quotes which has become 'true'.

And If Khan needs to think before he speaks, then so does Froch.

Karma's a *****, aint it?