After Amir Khan's series of stupid tweets

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Little Tyson, Apr 26, 2010.


  1. NoHomeJerome

    NoHomeJerome Boxing Junkie banned

    8,229
    0
    Feb 14, 2010
    Khan is a little punk and fraud. I've said it all along, the guy is a little *****.
     
  2. mugen82

    mugen82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,483
    0
    May 1, 2009
    I personally thought it was a brilliant performance from khan and showed how to beat the peekaboo style, i was well impressed! Some people may find that broing, but you cant say that about Khan then give us a Dirrel fight lol
     
  3. ollyc

    ollyc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,882
    0
    Jul 17, 2009
    This is pretty much how I feel.

    What about his win against Pascal. Conveniently forgot to mention that one didn't you Lazarus?

    Hang on Khan wasn't out against Limmond (due to incompetence), 'so there's no point in bringing that up'; and yet there you are rabbiting on about Froch's 'gift' decision. Using your logic, surely there's no point in 'bringing that up' since he got the nod?


    Go away you thick ****. If you think Froch lost every round you clearly know **** all.
    What is it with all these Khan fans who only post on threads related to Amir Khan anyway?
     
  4. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    At least Froch came to fight though. There's a chance dirrell could have won that if he'd have come forward more but the fact of the matter is he didn't it was Froch pressing. Khan though was on the back foot all night against Kotelnik, and for the record I thought it was a good performance too however it was a shite fight and it was a shite fight against a shite opponent. At least Dirrell was a tough fight against a more than live opponent in a very credible competition
     
  5. mugen82

    mugen82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,483
    0
    May 1, 2009
    Kotelnik is far from shite, he may have an ordinary style, but what he does is very effective and he does it really well. He's very difficult to look good against, yet Khan landed cleanly and regularly on him.
    Dirrell on the other hand was having his first world level fight, and most punters questioned whether he had a right to even be in the tournament, and was seen as the massive betting outsider. Froch may have come to fight, but the fact he barely landed a decent punch in all the fight says more about him than it does about Dirrell.
     
  6. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    Not in my opinion it doesn't if I'm honest. The Froch win in my personal opinion is a better win than the kotelnik one. I can see why you'd think otherwise which is fair enough, I have no argument with you, you at least have some objectivity on the issues and can back up your opinion unlike lazarus :good
     
  7. Darni187

    Darni187 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,387
    707
    Nov 13, 2008
    All i am saying May 15th Paulie is getting raped no condom straight leather.
     
  8. toffeejack

    toffeejack Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,064
    1
    Apr 30, 2007
    I don't think some immature tweets should have too much of an impact on your feeling towards him or not.

    The ones who voted hoping he gets sparked out next time were probably haters of Khan anyway.
     
  9. mugen82

    mugen82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,483
    0
    May 1, 2009
    Thats fair enough, i'm not a Froch hater, infact i'm a follower, and i think this whole twitter thing by Khan is childish and looks bad on British Boxing, especially if a tabloid picks this crap up, its the last thing we need with a chance of big time boxing finally returning to terretrial tv.
     
  10. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    I wasn't a hater beforehand (although I wasn't impressed with the Warren thing) but now I want to see him KO'd
     
  11. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    you have to worry about Khan's advisors though. He seems to have a knack of saying ridiculous things and getting in ridiculous arguments for no reason.

    the comment about Kotelnik was mental
    The 'I'd be a star if I was white' cmment was absurd considering the fame and fortune the young man has.
    He could have come out and said unlucky to Froch then he would have come off so much better
     
  12. safc1990

    safc1990 Goodbye Bolo :( Full Member

    4,999
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    Looks like Lazarus' carer left the IT room unattended. :-(
     
  13. mugen82

    mugen82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,483
    0
    May 1, 2009
    I cant disagree, but you have to know about the guy, since he was a kid he's been travelling the world going to amateur tournaments, and he's barely had any schooling. Ontop of that, even when he was at the olympics, he wasnt allowed out of his room by his dad.

    From his tweets, i think he's on holiday in vancouver atm, and away from all the "control", so he's just totally let loose and said all this bull****.

    As for the "white" comments, that was the journalist putting words in his mouth.
     
  14. avidlemon

    avidlemon Boxing Addict banned

    6,832
    0
    Feb 3, 2009
    where has lazurus gone? Is he masturbating furiously over a picutre of froch right now??

    "i'm sorry carl, i'm sorry"
     
  15. icemax

    icemax Indian Red Full Member

    27,158
    2
    Apr 24, 2008
    That image has just put me off of my dinner :-(