who did they ever beat ?

i am sure that as much as i am a gatekeeper / clubfighter type of a student ,
what i know is much more than what everyone here especially including you , will ever know. so you can be as hard as you desire. you are far more ******ed than me , no matter how much ******ed i am.
and believe me , most of the posters on this board would not have been able to even achieve what i do as students at where i am.
i do not want to fartify here , so i won't give you examples of how idiot you are and how null is your knowledge.
that was meant for subjects outside of boxing history , which you devote your life for , but you should understand that however lauzy i am as a student , you all will never know what i know , and i am not done.
i improve with time.
so be harsh and remember with every sentence that you are the dumber one with or without learning difficulties at your side.
some learning difficulties come from the surrounding environment and situations. but regardless of what i have or do not have you are dumber than me.

i don't feel like checking Gavillan's record right now , but Charles fought good opposition whenever possible , and he is not an example to what i said. no wonder you brought him and i didn't.
the same can be said on robinson and louis i guess.
and in liston's case , yes , in his fault or not , he fought lauzy opposition almost entirely. and please don't make me explain 'almost' to you.

 

and regarding boxrec stats. they mean ****.
i stopped believing boxrec and the rest of them sources including TV broadcast measurements long ago.
sorry , but when tarver is listed 6'3" and dawson is at 6'1" , and dawson is some good one inch at least taller than tarver .. you know the answer.
well , maybe not you but me and i bet some other posters here as well.
and there are too many more examples for this **** i can give.
but you watch more fights than i do.
so why do i need to labor so hard to explain it to you ?

 

the line you just "quoted" was not written by me , nice to see you resort to dirty tactics by changing my quote , please teach me how to do it .
i can win so many arguments that way.

 

great , so you just proved that line was not written by me.

but most of the board's intelligence is just taylor made for your sorts of scum. i just hope that the mods here are at least unable to edit my posts.

 

at least in the second time you really quoted me.

want to tell me now what was the lol about ?

 

why do you think i don't ?

 

McGrain just got owned , hard.
and exposed as a distorter of wise men's words.
and a scumbag as well.
but you can always learn from him that if you don't like a certain poster , quote him , change what he wrote and add some unauthentic mistake before hitting 'Submit Reply'.
and then wait till he is logged of for a full two or three hours , and reply.
and of course it always helps having Jason Voorhees' Login password.

 

fight one fight on one day .

 

quite true.
but :
rule #1 :
tell it to a MMA fighter.
rule #3 :
i've heard jack johnson learned to fight with a sack on his head.