Are ther bookies underestimating Mosley?

The odds are realistic imo.

 

they just show what people bet

i.e. the odds reflect the bets that come in, the bookies make their dough from the vig

 

i think they're underestimating mosley, but at the same time, i don't believe he'll beat floyd.

 

Odds only reflect what the public think not the bookies, I think maybe the joe public are under estimating Mosley a little.

 

The odds are decent. I had Mayweather absolutely cruising to a decision against De La Hoya and somehow the judges made a split decision out of it. So if Mosley hangs in there for the twelve then he might get the nod, especially since he probably fades less than Oscar.

 

the bookies ajust the odds give the amount waggerd so theres been alot of money for floyd so his odds are short

but the folks that fancy shane arnt backing him at the bookies

 

Mayweather was short odds when the first shows come out. The odds haven't actually changed much at all, you could get 10/3 against Mosley at the start of February.

 

yeah, i think he has a more of a chance than the odds they're offering, which is the same sort of odds they offered for gatti to beat floyd, but he's still likely to lose IMO. best bet is probably to either do floyd to win by decision at odds 1/2, or the fight to go the distance with either fighter winning, which is odds at something like 2/9.

 

I wonder what the odds will be against Pacquiao if Mayweather looks dominant against Mosley?

 

floyd will be favourite, he'll probably turn out to be somewhere in the region of a 8/13 favourite.

 

I've got a fiver on Mayweather to win on decision. Absoultly shocking odds but it's got to happen..