Paul Williams vs Tony Ayala (prime)m 154

Paul Williams is overrated.

 

Both overrated in my opinion.

I pick Williams cause hes a more proven fighter than Ayala but wouldnt really be surprised by any result.

 

Bro, he is overrated. I've seen him in top 10 P4P lists, and sure, he probably is top 10 P4P, but he's been pro for more than 10 years, only been champ twice, and that's because he was outboxed by Quintana.

Fighters like Mosley, Trinidad, Jones, Toney, Leonard, Vargas, De La Hoya, even gatti, Leija, Jesus Chavez, Judah, Castillo (just to name a few) had done way more by their 10th year.

 

Put it this way...I'd put my money on Berto to clean William's clock out.

 

You'd lose your money. Berto ****in sucks.

As for this matchup... I'd take Ayala by KO. He hit too damn hard for a guy as hittable as Paul.

 

Andre Berto is utter ****. Why people cant see this I duuno.

 

Yeah right, I wouldn't go that far. Williams is overrated, but overrated is enough to beat Berto

 

Berto's mediocrity at it's finest.

 

Berto is a tough ****er, and he is very strong and quick.

 

He's quick, thats about it. But handspeed means nothing if you have a **** defense, and a weak chin. The fact that he has short arms and has to reach in will bite him in the ass one day too.

 

Someone forgot to pass that peice of information to Rocky Marciano. :?

Paul Williams has shot defense, and was beaten by Quintana, and I think that Berto is better than Quintana, and can only get better.

 

Tony never fought this opposition. Williams is not great but he has been at the top for a few years and Tony never was. Tony was exciting, but unproven. Those punches which landed against lesser oppositiong wouldn't have landed with the better guys and they would have been throwing punches back.