Im more than enough convinced that Pacquiao beats Mayweather

Are you guys just silly or dumb which is it ? Floyd never uses the same game plan on every fighter. Richardson went on record stating he had watched Hours of DVD on Floyd and it only help for 2 rounds .. Shane's speed , strength and size were all nulled by floyd's skill .. Pac gets his ass whooped if he flight floyd.

 

Pac ain't finishing nobody................could not "finish" Cotto or the dead DLH or the human punch bag Clottey............Morales with a ounce left in the tank busted him all up so did Marquez , slow ass Cotto and the journeyman Clottey..............you need DEFENSE and a STRONG CONSISTANT JAB to trouble FMJ. Fact. Pac ai'nt got none of that and if he fights as reckless and Wiiiiiiiiiiiide open as in his last fights he is goona get laid out .Fact. If he turtles up and tries to "box" lol he'll get totally shut out. Fact.

 

Its good to be confident, but Pacquiao will get it worse.

 

No, I can't admit it. How can someone look like he was going to get exposed after 1 round? That's senseless talk from an agenda driven poster. You must have wanted to see Floyd get exposed. What did you expect him not to lose a round? I think we all thought it would be much closer.

Well, I'm an even more honest person that's giving Floyd the credit he deserved. He made Shane look bad. Champs don't just get shot after 1 fight. He was the Welterweight champ for Christ Sake. I think the activity was more his death than his age. The 2nd round was big for him but he lost his head. I think Shane tightened up and throw hard punches early, and that can burn you out a little. That's what legendary puncher like Shavers said. No, I'm not saying Shane came in at his best recently. But it was mostly due to Floyd.

Looked shot?

Is shot?

The commentators did not see it. Steward thought his age showed. Lampley thought there was no blueprint to beat Floyd after the fight. You're delusional... Merchent thought there was nothing suprising by Floyd doing what people expected (Within those first 5 rounds he looked sloppy :nut).

He looked fast you idiot, but he didn't know how to use that speed especially in the face of someone faster than him. He looked nervous and tight, but not shot. He was getting perplexed and had trouble ad******g. Did you expect him to throw bombs after Mayweather to get countered to **** after getting his face countered enough already? The steam didn't look there because he was tight and nervous. Slow as mollasses? Dude you're trolling now.

Floyd was better here than he was in the Marquez fight. No doubt. He threw more combinations, and more than just 1 punch. Yes he doesn't flurry like Pac but he was sometimes throwing 2-3-4 type combinations. Sharper, and great aggression. He pushed Mosley back more than JMM for Christ Sake.

 

i want to hear his post fight assessment.

 

Money would KO pac in 10!!! to much skill, just as faster and a super super fast right hand!!! if morales Right hand, put pac on ***** street .... well

i hope pac not to take the fight ... he would get exposed .. badly

 

Fact huh. I'd love to see the source.

 

See man... Now you are just being a hater. FMJ did that to SSM and SSM arguable has a better chin, defense, equally fast hands, AND reach and height advantages that Pac doesn't have.

If anything this fight shows that FMJ will stand in the pocket and Pac will get KTFO! :bbb

 

floyd takes your weapons away... makes you not even want to throw a jab

 

merchant says he scouted shane...

i thought shane got in the ring and called him out.

 

vcash and lifetime banishment.:good

 

Mayweather is clearly past his best, Mosley even more so. Both have lost speed and are getting hit with shots they just wouldn't have a few years back.

There's no easy answer to Pacquiao/Mayweather, and that's what would make it so compelling. Two of the top three fighters of this era, near their primes, at the same weight, at the peak of their popularity, in a tough, arguably pick-'em fight? "Sounds like a formula for combustion." My money's on Pacquiao, I think he has the footspeed to jump on Mayweather and the unorthodox offensive output to break holes in Mayweather's defence.

 

not the fans of pac...but the *******s and mayweather haters will talk about mayweather and his boxing career like they were down with it... like most ali haters... came around after they made kids and kids that made kids...

I hope their kids and grand kids grow up to say "**** you" ...


while lil cash flow is the champ.

 

it was obvious to me that Mosley didnt drop any game plan himself but was forced to fight a different fight after the 2nd because of Floyds offensive adjustment.

you wouldnt sound so much like a hater if you didnt try to notice this more.

 

I don't think anyone's denying that Mayweather put on a sensational performance last night (by his, or any other, standards). Dominating Mosley with offence to the extent that the towel is not far from coming in is clearly not something that happens every day. It doesn't change the fact that Mayweather (I think) looked past his best - noticeably slower and more flat-footed than a few years ago, making mistakes in the early rounds. On the other hand, he has matured into a legit Welter now, and was manhandling Mosley in the clinches at times (!) - ok, Mosley was losing spirit and energy, but Mayweather's strength has clearly come on leaps and bounds. Mosley didn't look at his best either. Partially, he just had no idea how to establish any offence against somebody with the craft of PBF, but he was also showing his age as he faded literally after the second round, his defence disintegrated and he looked tired. I'm not trying to rain on anybody's parade by pointing that out.