Joe Frazier vs. Rocky Marciano

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by spion, May 4, 2010.

  1. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    19,229
    Likes Received:
    258
    That´s a bold statement. He certainly was one of the best but I think Jack Dempsey, Jack Johnson, Joe Louis and perhaps Jim Jeffries were better infighters.
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    Messages:
    55,255
    Likes Received:
    10,363
    Good match up. Marciano never fought anyone on Frazier level in terms of power, speed, or rank.

    Style wise this is a fan's dream. When two aggressive forward moving types fight each other at heavyweight, my money is on the fighter with the better chin and power.

    There might be multiple knockdowns in this fantasy match up, and I could see either man winning. I'll go with Marciano via mid to late round TKO, as think Frazier's chin was suspect vs. punchers.
     
  3. iwudbumhuck

    iwudbumhuck New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Rocky balboa wud bang both of these:smoke n marco captain huck is the best boxer on the planet :happy apart from cyp champ kyle shaughnessy:hat:sillyboy better know mcjamacia braaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaap:rasta
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    114,671
    Likes Received:
    51,478
    Toss a coin.
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    82,426
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    x2
     
  6. hhascup

    hhascup Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,685
    Likes Received:
    178
    Not too many would pick Walcott especially at that time in his career (10-7 in his last 17 bouts). I think we went over that many times. Also, Rocky is very hard to rate because of his record. Some boxing experts rate him very high because of it, in the top 5, and others very low, because of who he beat, outside the top 10. I still rate him in my top 10 but at the lower end, so I am somewhat in the middle when it comes to Rocky. Everytime his name comes up, I know if I give my opinion, some people on this forum will jump on me for it and others will support it, BUT it's all in fun.
     
  7. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    19,229
    Likes Received:
    258
    Probably but IMO Jersey Joe at his best has a chance against every hw. With a proper managed career he would be greater than both Louis and Ali imo.

    I´m one of those who rank Marciano high. And I consider the 70s a tad overrated - or overhyped may fit better perhaps.
     
  8. hhascup

    hhascup Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,685
    Likes Received:
    178
    I respect that, BUT Frazier would be the best puncher Rocky ever went against too. I also think if Foreman hit Rocky as he did Joe, he too would have had the same results.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    114,671
    Likes Received:
    51,478

    Da ****?

    He got KTFO by Marciano and Louis. How would "proper management" have prevented this?
     
  10. hhascup

    hhascup Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,685
    Likes Received:
    178
    Again, I like Walcott very much. I knew him back in the 1970's and was a very nice guy BUT I can not see rating him over Louis or Ali at their best. When we put a monument up of Walcott in Camden, New Jersey, I was the main speaker. http://www.trufanboxing.com/origin11.jpg
     
  11. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    25,456
    Likes Received:
    9,330
    Would be a classic all action war ! No doubt about it. Picking a winner in this one really concentrates the mind. However,I do n't like sitting on the fence,so after a lot of thought,I would say that the winner would be Smokin' Joe. Providing his chin stood up to Rocky's opening onslaught,Frazier's extra weight would start to tell halfway through the fight. Frazier tko by round 12. Rocky's propensity to bleed would also be a factor.
     
  12. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    19,229
    Likes Received:
    258
    Hm, I don´t think Joe hit harder than Walcott. He would hit more often due to his higher workrate. But I think Marciano has the defence and chin to take it. And he would back. Even harder than he would get hit. With both hands.

    Foreman could take out Marciano early. Definitly. At the very least he would knock him down. But if Archie Moore couldn´t finish him, I wonder if Big George could. And Rocky would never show up in the shape Frazier did against George. Don´t really know. Stylewise Foreman has a big advantage but with Rocky´s will, determination and chin ... probably still Foreman.
     
  13. hhascup

    hhascup Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2006
    Messages:
    4,685
    Likes Received:
    178
    You have to be kidding. Walcott landed one of the Greatest one punch KO's in boxing history but he was not in Joe's class as far as punching power goes.
     
  14. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    19,229
    Likes Received:
    258
    Well, I was thinking about him beeing brought along like for example Louis was. He probably would have taken over during WW2 and ruled until Marciano would come around.


    Yep, I know, I read it in another thread. I´m a bit jealous I must say. What I was talking about was not Walcott beating Louis and Ali at their best - albeit I think he would have a chance - but him surpassing their achievements. I think he had the potential to do this.
     
  15. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    19,229
    Likes Received:
    258
    Nah, I´m serious. I think Frazier had power but most of his damage comes from accumulation. I think Walcott had slightly more power but did less damage overall because he threw less punches.
    Neither one is a big one punch knock out puncher like Foreman.