Which alphabet organisation do you take THE MOST serious?

IBF. Their rules seem to promote unification.

That being said, they are still corrupt and in bed with certain promoters, and thus should be destroyed.

 

They're all responsible for bat**** crazy decisions but the IBF strikes me as the most understated on the bat**** front right now. But even still, I think all in all they're all the same kettle of fish in the major four. The IBO is looking more credible as a fifth by the day. I know, it's sad but I think it's true. Fifth. Five. Quintobelto.

 

none they are all good for hyping contenders and unheralded fighters but if you ain't got the ring your not the champ

 

I rarely disagree with who they call the champ but I often disagree with who they won't call the champ. I think by now, if it weren't for their 1 VS 2 (sometimes three) or beat the champ rule it would be a no brainer to call Darchinyan THE super flyweight champ for instance.

 

UBO. The champion of the UNIVERSE. who the **** can argue that?

 

NABO for me.

 

...But that's national. And isn't it part of the WBO?

 

The WBC but they haven't done themselves any favours by bringing out the diamond belt.

 

WBC still holds the most prestige but, **** all of them.....

IBF is notorious for having people pay to fight in eliminators for title shots and having to wait years to get a shot

 

At the mo I'd say the IBF are the most respectable, though the WBC does seem to attract the biggest fighters more often than not, they are completely corrupt now with their silver and diamond belts, and stripping fighters for unifying (Tim Bradley).

 

Major: IBF and WBO

Minor: IBO and IBA.

 

I dont really take any of them serious as politics could mean the best Fighter in the division might not even have any belt! So I put Other

 

If you ask me it's in this order

IBF, WBC
WBA, WBO
IBO

I like IBO because I'm pretty sure they charge **** all fees and there ratings are by computer. That said some of there titleholders are a bit embarassing.