Which alphabet organisation do you take THE MOST serious?

WBO always promoting unification and strong mandatory enforcement,
they does not strip their champions for political reasons,
the problem with WBO and its mandatory is that even they have
in general the same boxers at the list as other organizations
the top boxers are rather challenging other belts so they have
no choice and selecting their mandatory form the lower available part
which are either some washed up bodies or unproven upcomers
not ready to fight for the WBC/WBA/IBF titles.

 

How can you possibly respect the IBO?? about 8 of 10 of their titles are vacant. And not long ago they had matthew hatton fighting Lovemore ndou for thier Welterweight version!! IBO is a complete and utter joke.

WBC is the most prestigious and recognisable but their rankings are ridiculous and they strip fighters for wanting to unify which is pathetic.

IBF is reasonably okay.

WBO foolishly de legitamize themselves by creating these stupid interim belts

WBA has become a paper championship in recent years and their rankings are an absolute joke, also they bend and change their own rules as and when it suits them. (such as not enforcing Khan vs maidana recently). WBA is by far the worst belt

 

WBA, WBA and IBF

 

Me its in this order,

1. WBC- Still like the Green and gold, almost every champion that held the WBC belt was considered the best of the division.
2. IBF- Best rules out of all the belt organizations, consider Unification more important than mandatory
3. IBO- Have a good list of champions, every champ seems to like the IBO belt more than the others, still have some serious gaps in the champions list though like Lovemore N'dou as Welterweight Champion.

4. WBA- Okay belt Org, Heavyweight belt is a ****ing joke though because of the circle jerk of Ruiz, Chargaev, Valuev, and Holyfield.

5. WBO- These belts always seem to find their way to Europe, even when the Euro fighter is trash compared to the rest of the division.

....




14432332. WBF

 

they're all ****! Floyd needs to start his own organization

 

???

Current WBO Champions:

1. Donnie Nietes -

This content is protected

- Minimumweight - Since 2007
2. Ivan Calderon -

This content is protected

- Junior Flyweight - Since 2007
3. Omar Andres Narvaez -

This content is protected

- Flyweight - Since 2002
4. Jorge Arce -

This content is protected

- Junior Bantamweight - 2010 (last champ

This content is protected

Sonsona)
5. Fernando Montiel -

This content is protected

-Bantamweight - Since 2009
6. Wilfredo Vazquez Junior -

This content is protected

- Junior Featherweight - 2010 (

This content is protected

Juanma Lopez previous champion)
7. Juan Manuel Lopez -

This content is protected

- Featherweight - 2010 (previous champion is

This content is protected

Steve Luevano)
8. Roman Martinez -

This content is protected

- Junior Lightweight - Since 2009
9. Juan Manuel Marquez -

This content is protected

- Lightweight - Since 2009
10. Timothy Bradley -

This content is protected

- Junior Welterweight - Since 2009
11. Manny Pacquiao -

This content is protected

- Welterweight - Since 2009
12. Sergiy Dzinziruk -

This content is protected

- Light Middleweight - Since 2005
13. Sergio Martinez -

This content is protected

- Middleweight - 2010 (previously held in order by

This content is protected

Kelly Pavlik,

This content is protected

Jermaine Taylor,

This content is protected

Bernard Hopkins,

This content is protected

Oscar De La Hoya)
14. Robert Stieglitz -

This content is protected

- Super Middleweight - Since 2009
15. Jurgen Brahmer -

This content is protected

- Light Heavyweight - Since 2009
16. Marco Huck -

This content is protected

- Cruiserweight - Since 2009
17. Wladimir Klitschko -

This content is protected

- Heavyweight - Since 2008

Wlad, Huck, Dzinziruk...trash by comparison to the rest of their divisions? Granted Stieglitz and Brahmer are not the best of their divisions but it certainly doesn't look like a pattern at the moment. Myth busted.

 

IBF is pathetic owing to its decisions around keeping titles on fighters like Zab Judah and some of it's rating system.

WBC has gotten worse and worse and is fast becoming a joke with it's Diamond title and stipulations

WBA with its' "super" titles is pathetic, they've had three champions in one division before

WBO seems to be the most consistent rating authority and generally the "better" fighters of the division wear the strap.

 

IBF and WBC

 

Wbc, ibf


wba, ibo, wbo

 

The IBF have been the least corrupt looking and done the least amount of stupid things lately. Thats the best you can say about the whole lot.

 

The NABF. The only halfway decent alphabet title out there.

 

u just start watching boxing?

WBA u take most serious? John Ruiz as a guy that fights in 11 WBA title bouts ? their heavyweight champion? Seems like the best heavweights in the decade never fought for the WBA title..
WBA gives unworthy challengers mandatory shouts orshots in general...remember the great carl davis drummond vs chagaev title fight a few years ago?

 

I used to think the WBC was the best, then Sulaiman opened his mouth

Now, I think they are equally shitty

 

Why are muitable opitions avaible for the question asking THE MOST?
I fell that The IBF seems to do the least to screw things up. They are by no means perfect. Despite the fact that Don King seems to own the WBC like no other promoter owns any other sactioning body. The WBC seems to have a lot of respect among boxers.
I fell that anyone who holds a IBF, WBC, WBA, WBO and Ring belt can call himself a world champion. The IBO is on the outside looking in.