Here are my all time ratings of the black murders row heavyweights who were shunned out of heavyweight title shots due to the color of their skin, and others perhaps due to fear. Enjoy. Top 30 Black Murders Row heavyweights who never got a shot at the heavyweight title Pre 1960 1. Sam Langford- 5'6 175lb 76" This content is protected 2. Harry Wills- 6'3 210lb 80" This content is protected 3. Peter Jackson- 6'2 200lb 77" This content is protected 4. Elmer Ray- 6'2 195lb 81" This content is protected 5. George Godfrey- 6'3 225lb 80" This content is protected 6. Joe Jeanette- 5'10 195lb This content is protected 7. Sam McVea- 5'10 215lb 75" This content is protected 8. Jimmy Bivins- 5'9 180lb 79" This content is protected 9. Eddie Machen- 6'0 195lb 75" This content is protected 10. Lee Q Murray- 6'3 210lb This content is protected
11. Cleveland Williams- 6'3 215lb 80" This content is protected 12. Zora Folley- 6'1 195lb This content is protected 13. Clarence Henry- 6'1 185lb This content is protected 14. Larry Gains- 6'0 200lb This content is protected 15. Bob Baker- 6'2 210lb This content is protected 16. Kid Norfolk- 5'9 175lb This content is protected 17. Turkey Thompson- 5'9 205lb This content is protected 18. Tiger Jack Fox- 6'0 175lb 75" This content is protected 19. Lem Franklin- 6'2 200lb 76" This content is protected 20. Nino Valdes- 6'3 210lb 80" This content is protected
21. Harry Bobo- 6'4 210lb 78" This content is protected 22. Denver Ed Martin- 6'6 190lb 82" This content is protected 23. Hank Griffin- 6'1 200lb This content is protected 24. Bob Satterfield- 5'10 185lb This content is protected 25. Jeff Clark- 5'11 175lb This content is protected 26. Earl Walls- 6'3 200lb 78" This content is protected 27. Roscoe Toles- 6'2 200lb This content is protected 28. Eddie Blunt- 6'0 220lb This content is protected 29. Jack Trammel- 6'6 195lb 80" This content is protected 30. Frank Childs- 5'9 180lb This content is protected
HM: Leroy Haynes- 6'1 195lb 76" This content is protected Curtis Hatchetman Sheppard- 5'11 185lb This content is protected Ed Bearcat Wright- 6'1 210lb This content is protected
Full List Top 30 1. Sam Langford- 5'6 175lb 76" 2. Harry Wills- 6'3 210lb 80" 3. Peter Jackson- 6'2 200lb 77" 4. Elmer Ray- 6'2 195lb 81" 5. George Godfrey- 6'3 225lb 80" 6. Joe Jeanette- 5'10 195lb 7. Sam McVea- 5'10 215lb 75" 8. Jimmy Bivins- 5'9 180lb 79" 9. Eddie Machen- 6'0 195lb 75" 10. Lee Q Murray- 6'3 210lb 11. Cleveland Williams- 6'3 215lb 80" 12. Zora Folley- 6'1 195lb 13. Clarence Henry- 6'1 185lb 14. Larry Gains- 6'0 200lb 15. Bob Baker- 6'2 210lb 16. Kid Norfolk- 5'9 175lb 17. Turkey Thompson- 5'9 205lb 18. Tiger Jack Fox- 6'0 175lb 75" 19. Lem Franklin- 6'2 200lb 76" 20. Nino Valdes- 6'3 210lb 80" 21. Harry Bobo- 6'4 210lb 78" 22. Denver Ed Martin- 6'6 190lb 82" 23. Hank Griffin- 6'1 200lb 24. Bob Satterfield 5'10 185lb 25. Jeff Clark- 5'11 175lb 26. Earl Walls- 6’3 200lb 78” 27. Roscoe Toles- 6’2 200lb 28. Eddie Blunt- 6'0 220lb 29. Jack Trammel- 6'6 195lb 80" 30. Frank Childs- 5'9 180lb HM: Leroy Haynes 6'1 195lb Hatchetman Sheppard 5’11 185lb Ed Bearcar Wright 6'1 210lb
Great to see these guys get some recognition, How different could the history of boxing be had they got the chances they deserved!!!
This is a good list. I would have to have a think about it, a while but some other guys who might have a claim that i can think of off hand: Ed "Bearcat" Wright, Bob Armstrong, Klondike John Haines and Brad Simmons
Edited: Fogey I decided to put satterfield in. Number 24. Satterfield. I had such a difficult time with him. Bottom Line is of the guys I put on the list, most of these men were in position to get title shots. Satterfield was never ever rated higher than # 8 by Ring Magazine. He barely broke the top 10 twice. while he did score some big victories in his career, he suffered quite a few bad losses too. Satterfield was never in position for a title shot against Marciano, according to papers. Nor was he ever in position to fight for the vacant title when Marciano retired. Satterfield was a very dangerous fighter when he was on, but he was never considered a serious title challlenger. Henry was considered a serious title challenger during walcott and charles reigns, valdes was considered a serious titlle challenger from 1953-1959, baker was considered a serious title challenger from 1951- marcianos retirement. Walls was considered a potential marciano title opponnent and joe louis himself was trying to promote it. I left Bob off. I am not happy about it, as I feel he could and did beat some of these men on the list, but thats the way it is. In fact if I made this list tomm, I would def include him. I just decided not too today. I will move him into honorable mention. John Holman- Big strong and hard hitting. That's it. Not really world class. the other big men valdes, baker, jackson, walls were a clear step above him in skill department. Holman recorded some nice wins, and he did earn a title eliminator against baker when rocky retired...but he was never in good position to challenge for the title. I would rate satterfield over him.
I decided to leave Armstrong off. I personally feel he was the worst out of the 4...Griffen, childs, Martin. Martin defeated household names Sam Mcvea, Hank Griffen, bob armstrong, and frank childs. He was coloured heavyweight champ and considered next in line for a shot at jeffries in 1902. Hank Griffen was beating Jeffries for 17 rounds, and beat Jack Johnson. He also drew with jack johnson in 2 other meetings. Frank Childs was colored heavyweight champ for years and knocked out bob armstrong twice Armstrong was more of a journeyman, who performed well against martin. He got knocked out, beaten, by a lot of journeyman of the era. The papers did not regard him too highly.
I don't think you are accurate in saying Satterfield was never in a position to fight for the title. I think he would have fought for the title if he defeated Charles. It was an elimination. Also, Baker and Valdes might have been considered contenders, but they each lost badly to Satterfield. So did Williams and Holman. A victory over Harold Johnson counts for something also. Who could go out---Norfolk was a lightheavyweight. If being in line for a title shot is the issue, when was Eddie Blunt in line for a shot? Satterfield was very erratic, but he stayed up there quite a bit longer than some of the men on your list.
I decided to put satterfield in. Like I said the man recorded TERRIFIC wins. But bottom line, and I said it earlier, he was never rated highly in ring magazine ratings. Valdes was # 1 contender for 2 years, and top 5 for 2 other years. Bob Baker was rated in the top 5 three or four times. williams was rated in the top 5 four years in a row. walls top 5 two years in a row, walls-marciano fight was almost scheduled. These men made waves in the ring magazine ratings. Satterfield never got himself deep in there. that's a fact fogey. Satterfield during his career only cracked the ring mags twice, and he barely squeezed in at numbers 8 and 9. Norfolk beat up billy miske and beat harry greb. he was a top contender for a title shot vs dempsey. dempsey ducked him, drew the color line. You could make a case I shud put harold johnson in my list. But i left him out because he never campaigned for a title shot at heavyweight, which is why you never see his name in the ring magazine ratings. If i were to include him, he would be in my top 5 on this list.
I think you should give John Holman another look. I would say he probably has close to the most impressive list of ko victims of any man who never held the championship. He might be number one: Holman ko'd Ezzard Charles, Elmer Ray, Bob Satterfield, Cesar Brion, Boardwalk Billy Smith, and Willie Bean. He also outpointed Turkey Thompson, Sid Peaks, and Gene Jones. Holman actually rose higher in the yearly rankings than Walls (#4 to #5) and I think has the more impressive resume as Walls got to a lot of guys, other than perhaps Layne, who were totally washed up. Most of Holman's names were still winning fights.