PPV hypothetical: Mosley-Pac or Mayweather-Clottey ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by cuchulain, May 10, 2010.


Page 4 of 5
  1. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    You missed the point of the thread and are calling people ******ed.....NICE:hi:

    Even your last minute edit didn't help you!
     
    Gonzarelli, May 10, 2010
    Gonzarelli, May 10, 2010
    #46
  2. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Wow, you are so ******ed I cant even begin to imagine the problems that you have in your head.
     
    eze, May 10, 2010
    eze, May 10, 2010
    #47
  3. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    First things first, did you get the point of the thread after Chuchu explained it to you:think
     
    Gonzarelli, May 10, 2010
    Gonzarelli, May 10, 2010
    #48
  4. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    I already understood the point of the thread.

    Why do you think I called the thread and the question stupid?

    Because if chu feels the need to make a thread about the people who compare Clottey-Pac to Mosley-mayweather, then he's no smarter than the rest of them.
     
    eze, May 10, 2010
    eze, May 10, 2010
    #49
  5. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    It is a BS supposition because Pac could have made the Mosley fight.

    If you want to make a supposition why don't you say...

    Pac/Mosley + Pac/Clottey = Total PPV

    FMJ/Mosley + FMJ/Clottey = Total PPV

    Which is greater? Instead you ask irrational BS. You won't ask that question because you KNOW the answer *******.:deal
     
    bald_head_slick, May 10, 2010
    bald_head_slick, May 10, 2010
    #50
  6. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,568
    10,602
    Jan 6, 2007
    No, you see, you STILL don't get it.

    Let me try again.

    The thread was an indirect rebuttal to those (and they were many) who claimed that the comparison of the PPVs from the two fights would show which fighter was the bigger draw.

    Now, while that group may not have included you, it did exist and had many members.

    Therefore, rebutting their claim with a hypothetical scenario was not stupid but rather, made the intended point .

    I hope that makes it clear for you.




    If not, I'm going to need several crayons of different colours to draw a picture for you.
     
    cuchulain, May 10, 2010
    cuchulain, May 10, 2010
    #51
  7. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    Holy crap you're obtuse. What does the TS's IQ have to do with any of this:patsch

    I'm done with you!
    :hi:
     
    Gonzarelli, May 10, 2010
    Gonzarelli, May 10, 2010
    #52
  8. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Of course your done, you made yourself look like a moron.
     
    eze, May 10, 2010
    eze, May 10, 2010
    #53
  9. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Ignore eze.
    He's a nut hugger 1 boxer lover.
     
    LukeO, May 10, 2010
    LukeO, May 10, 2010
    #54
  10. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    I already said that, are you that blind chu?

    Comparing Mosley-mayweather to Pac-Clottey is stupid. I said that a few times already.

    Im starting to think you don't even understand the point of your own thread.
     
    eze, May 10, 2010
    eze, May 10, 2010
    #55
  11. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,568
    10,602
    Jan 6, 2007
    I've already explained the point of the thread to EZE.

    You can read it all in here. I'm not going to redo it.


    Whether he could or could not have made it is a separate argument and in no way affects the point I was making in the thread.


    Because that would not have rebutted those who claimed the relative ppv numbers from the two ppvs were proof of who was the bigger draw.


    There is nothing irrational about the thread question.

    In your post, you appear to have trouble with the basics of logic, leaping to conclusions that are not supported by your premises.


    ******* ???

    Yet another brilliant piece of reasoning on your part. I ask a straightforward question to disprove a fallacy, and I'm a ******* ?

    The fact that I've stated many times that I believe Floyd to be the superior boxer in just about every facet of the game makes me a ******* ?

    And the fact that I argued in several threads that Pac should not get Cotto's 147 lb belt (and more or less proved the point, logically) unless Cotto was allowed to come in at 147, makes me a ******* ?


    You're a sad case, Bald-head.
     
    cuchulain, May 10, 2010
    cuchulain, May 10, 2010
    #56
  12. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    LMFAO...END THE THREAD...FUKIN DUMBAZZ TS GOT OWNED.:rofl:rofl:rofl CLEAR WHAT THE DUMMY WAS TRYING TO DO..

    FU34 YOUR "HYPOTHETICAL" SITUATION..

    LETS LOOK AT COMMON OPPONENTS:silly:think
     
    sdsfinest22, May 10, 2010
    sdsfinest22, May 10, 2010
    #57
  13. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,568
    10,602
    Jan 6, 2007
    Last chance for you here, EZE.

    You claim to not be one of those who argued that the PPVs from the two fights were proof of who was the bigger draw.

    Fine.

    Then the thread question was not aimed at you.

    Rather, it was aimed at those not blessed with your degree of perspicacity, and who argued that the PPVs did prove their point.

    That does not make it a stupid thread.
     
    cuchulain, May 10, 2010
    cuchulain, May 10, 2010
    #58
  14. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Yes it does, because you are the one who fell for the stupid ****ing argument in the first place.


    Everyone that isn't bias knows Floyd is the bigger draw than Pacquiao but not by much. And that if his fight with Mosley did near 2 million or more he would have a legit claim at asking more than 50/50.

    Anyone that's not bias to either side knows that.

    No one is denying Pac is not a draw, he's a huge draw.

    And Im glad that Mosley-Mayweather did 1.4 because it was a good number but doesn't allow him or Pac to ask for more.
     
    eze, May 10, 2010
    eze, May 10, 2010
    #59
  15. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    OMG, is this a freaking joke?

    Pac-Mosley has the potential of overtaking Hagler-Hearns in terms of action and excitement.

    Floyd-Clottey has the potential of being the boringest.
     
    PATSYS, May 10, 2010
    PATSYS, May 10, 2010
    #60
Page 4 of 5