PPV hypothetical: Mosley-Pac or Mayweather-Clottey ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by cuchulain, May 10, 2010.


  1. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,560
    10,593
    Jan 6, 2007
    I was doing real fine at remaining polite here Sad, and carefully explaining my positions to couple of curious, but I'm sure, well-meaning lads whose thinking was just a little muddled.

    But with the arrival of the ****in' villiage idiot into the thread, I think I'll give up on politeness.


    Go back and read the whole ****ing thread you ****ing imbecilic simpleton.

    It's all laid out there for you.

    Now if you had more than one set of grandparents in your lineage, and your momma had stayed off the ****in' crack for nine months, you might have some sort of ****in' clue as to reading, comprehension and thinking.

    Instead, you end up blithering like some epileptic spastic in BLOCK CAPITALS, jerkin' off all over your keyboard, totally oblivious to any of what's being discussed.

    DUMBAZZ ???
    :yep
     
  2. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    I agree.

    Clottey covers up way too much. Specially if you consider Pac who is quite ****ing exciting, made to look boring because he can't do much vs a covering punching bag.
     
  3. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,560
    10,593
    Jan 6, 2007


    Explain how refuting the "stupid ****ing argument" is falling for it.
     
  4. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Because, everyone outside those people knew that wasn't the right way to compare.

    There's only a select few who brought this argument up, most of the forum goes towards comparing the fighters against the same opponents.
     
  5. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,560
    10,593
    Jan 6, 2007
    Possibly true.

    But it was an attempt on my part to show THAT PARTICULAR GROUP that their reasoning was faulty.

    That was not "falling" for their argument. Nor was it stupid.

    I believe you now realize that. So your problem becomes one of how to backtrack from post #16.

    No problem. No need.

    Clearly, you're not on a par with poor brain damaged sds, who's so ****in' stupid that he argues the point with me about the comparison, and then hauls his sorry, ****-for-brains ass into the poll and votes for Floyd-Clottey.

    :rofl:rofl
     
  6. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    I merely think that this thread is stupid because even giving those people who said that the time of day is stupid. Most of them just wanted to rile you up. Nothing more.
     
  7. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    You are such a simpleton. Your thread is pointless. You are comparing apples to oranges when you had multiple chances to compare apples to apples (the list of previous common opponents) and then purposely tossed the last apple (Pac's duck of Mosley) to compare apples to oranges (the opponent Mayweather ended up with because Pac ducked drugged testing).

    Then somehow, though everything lines up against your insane reasoning, you want to act as though this is valid "excuse" as to why Pac's PPV sucked? I am sure you will use this as a lead into why Pac is the real draw right? No. Pac had more than enough time to make meaningful fights. He ducked both times. He and Arum made sweet love and laid that rotten Clottey egg so he has to sit on it!

    Your hypothetical subliminal BS does not fly. And yes you are a *******, though I agree with your Cotto analysis.
     
  8. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,560
    10,593
    Jan 6, 2007

    Having explained things for you in simple terms, and given that you can't grasp the most elementary of reasoning, I have to conclude that you're not a ******* but a RE****.

    More disturbing, your tendancy to want to discuss something completely different from the thread question indicates pathology of some kind in the mental department.

    But most disturbing of all is your gleeful use of homoerotic imagery here

    I hope your keyboard isn't all sticky.:oops:



    Now calm yourself down, lad. Put away the booze and get to your bed.

    Or you're going to hate yourself when you read your muddled drivel in the morning.


    :hi:
     
  9. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,560
    10,593
    Jan 6, 2007
    Now, Now.

    :nono


    Their numbers continue to grow in this poll (eleven of them now).


    And at least TWO very respectable Floyd fans, whose posts are usually insightful on topics other than Floyd, made the very point this thread refuted.




    ( Notice (and this is something Baldy can't grasp) that I'm not commenting here on which of the two men is the bigger draw.

    I'm merely pointing out the flaws in stating that their two respective recent bouts settle the question.)
     
  10. silkyjohnson

    silkyjohnson Active Member Full Member

    898
    0
    Dec 17, 2009
    The answer is freakin obvious whether u're a ******* or *****... honestly there's no real reason to even ask this question... especially after his performance with pac, clottey's never gonna headline another PPV in his life