Mayweather should beat pacquiao but.........

****, if only Pacquiao had fought that Juan Diaz and washed up Joel Casamayor...he'd be considered one of the greatest today. Instead, he went up and fought Oscar De La Hoya, Ricky Hatton, Miguel Cotto, and Joshua Clottey. Cowardice, I tell you...cowardice! Afraid of the Raheem machine.

I'm not taking these questions seriously...for obvious reasons.

 

Oscar at 147lbs (a weight he didnt fight at in a decade)2 years AFTER MAYWEATHER BEAT HIM AT HIS WEIGHT.

Hatton 2 years after Mayweather knocked him out, when he was undefeated.

Cotto at a catchweight after Cotto was ruined by Margarito and came back and won a VACANT belt vs some gusy names Jennings....

Clottey?atsch coming off a loss to Cotto?

:-(

try again

:good

 

and Raheem isnt **** now, but at the time, he just beat the guy who slapped Pac around the ring and Pac wanted to fight Morales because he was wayy over the hill......come on man. Lets be real here.....you said in an earlier post that Pac didnt fight Raheem because he wanted to get revenge on Morales & then moved up to 135...but i instanly debunked that theory when i informed you that after fighting Morales he stayed @ 130 for 2 and a half years....:good

your entire approach to debating doesnt consist of objectivity or facts

 

Clown please. Look at your Avatar. It shows that you don't know what you are talking about. :yep

 

So mayweather SHOULD be P4P #1 .. ain't no p4p champ an underdog to someone in his weight class

 

Whoa ... I'm a floyd fan but pac fight de la hoya over raheem doesn't make him a coward ... if anything it makes him who he is today ... if he didn't go up he prolly would be ranked 2nd p4p (like he really should be) .. the reason why he is number 1 is cuz he's been winning @ 135- 147 ... and fighting oscar he made wayyyyyy more money for about an equal amount of risk ... lookin into it now, yes indeed he whooped dhl and it wasn't a risk @ all .. but going into it .. yes it was a risk ... and with raheem he might've won but he probably wouldn't look good doing it .. raheem is a sloppy fight for any1 ... soo give pac credit .. he did what a lot of people thought he was too small to do

 

I said this as well and almost got laughed off the forum about a month ago. His style is more dangerous for PBF than Pac will be.

 

Can i ask you a question Sir?

What makes you think Mayweather should get on his bike or will be on his bike fighting Pacquiao?

 

HOW LONG AGO WAS THAT?/ U ALWAYS TALKIN ABOUT HOW 2005 IS SO LONG AGO..

NOW U TALKIN 2002..

SO LEMME GET IT RIGHT...IF WE TALKIN FLOYD THAN 2002 COUNTS IN ARGUMENTS..BUT IF WE TALKIN MANNY THAN 2005 FIGHTS DONT COUNT RIGHT???:nut

 

he's just as much in his prime as Mayweather, maybe less Pacquiao has been in more wars then Mayweather. It kills me how people throw this being in your prime thing around. If he was so much in his prime would either of these fighters be comteplating retirement as they both recently have.:-(

 

Dont worry I already owned him on page 5:deal

 

Your sorry non boxing understanding ass didn't own anything. You still never answered about how Clottey is more squared up than the average fighter. Probably because you didn't even know it. Idiot.

Like I said... If Clottey can EASILY hit you with lead rights. Mayweather is going to have a picnic! :yep

 

You and I both know your a perpetrator its okay though I get it, you have a complex. Your not alone their are alot of inferior humans like you trying to gain some type of relevance. :thumbsup

 

Perpetrator?

You still haven't addressed the issue at hand and like most idiots when you call their bluff you are now cracking jokes.

Clottey defends square and was eating Pac alive with straight rights. Mayweather is going to brutalize Pac!

This content is protected

I think you may be referring to your own sorry state. :think

 

It about as relevant as the "OMG HOW CAN FLOYD STOP 1200 PUNCHES?!?!1!"