Kelly Pavlik to consider light-heavyweight + things to think about

He just said if he was invited, he would refuse cause the six fighters are fighting for peanuts. <<<What don't you understand?

 

Don't be so critical. The guy just managed to accurately dictate a post to his carer. It's probably a first.

 

They think if enough of them repeat it enough it will become fact. Works on ESB I guess.....

 

I honestly don't hate Pavlik. But guys like Booradley thinks Pavlik is like an unstoppable fighter. Pavlik is a real good fighter but i never thought he was a great fighter. I said it for years that Pavlik is way too 1 dimensional in which it's been proven with 2 losses to slick fighters.

 

It's the same story. Unless you're horribly anti-Pavlik, he at least has a chance against the likes of Froch, AA and Green, could at least scoop up a strap at 168 at some point, could at least be a decent contender, at least make some money and get back in the ring, which is what fighters do. What's wrong with that?

The slopbuckets that are talking in these threads are the same slopbuckets that would have had Mosley retired after losing to Forrest the second time, Hopkins retired after losing to Taylor, Liston retired after losing Ali etc. The trail of stupidity is there on the historical record.

 

Don't you feel honored that people that KNOW things with such certainty deem to grace us with their presence on this board? After all, they must all have more money than God ever DREAMED of having. At least if you go by their boasts here. Ray must be the world's wealthiest bookie going by his "guarantee". Or just another load mouthed poster? :deal

 

Honestly if his two losses haven't taken a lot out of him, I could see him beating guys like Stieglitz easily, and from the S6 he would beat Froch, Green and perhaps Kessler. At 175 he has a good chance with everyone except Dawson, but he would lose badly to Ward Dirrell and Bute imo.

 

I agree with this. And I'm still unsure about Kessler too. I don't know how much he has left.

 

I joined ESB in August 2006. The very first thread I made was "What should McKart do now." I asked a simple question: "Now that Bronco McKart has lost by KO to Kelly Pavlik, what should he do next?" The consensus opinion was that losing to Pavlik meant that McKart was shot to ****, and should retire immediately. Things haven't changed much.

 

Kelly is on his way to getting KTFO in the higher weight classes

 

Absolute Brillant news!!!!!! I say it again Pavliks a beast at 168 healthy and no struggling to make the weight, Now this is what i been saying all along, I put money where my mouth is and most readers now I am a man with few words but always on point, look for pavlik to do damage in the 168,

 

i was talking about what boxingscience said about kelly refusing super six, u responded to that and i responded to u.. what dont u understand? tell u what, go back over the posts.

 

Is moving to 168 going to take away his awful footwork, slow plodding one two style and ridiculously slow hand speed?

Double the jab!

 

well everyone has a favorate fighter and stick by them, as u do.and yes maybe kelly is one dimensional (i dont think so) , and everyone has their opinnions. and big deal 2 losses ( i know no one else has losses),but those who like kelly stand by him,,yes we are sick he lost but he lost to a very good fighter..no shame in that.oh by the way arent u a williams follower..hows he doing these days..imo not to impressive.but again thats my opinnion and i am not gonna talk about him on threads and cut him down every chance i get as u do with pavlik..

 

every time u post no one responds to u except the few ******* like u ..but keep it coming u make me laugh