Being a betting man Paulie is at 7/2 to win the fight or 6/1 to win on points. Now that seems to me to be a bet that would interest me more than Khan no value in it at all. Paulie is in the last chance saloon if he gets beaten he is finished at World level. If he beats Khan he can push on and move forward again. Its all about who wants it the most. I will be backing Paulie to win on points. Add into that I will also be betting on Katsidis to do Mitchell who is also at a great price too 7/1 to win on points 2/1 to win by knock out.
Exactly. In contests where you believe it's a tough call, 50-50 or 60-40 either way, you have a SMALL bet on the outcome with the best value. It's not unreasonable to believe that Katsidis would either stop or outpoint Mitchell - he was even with Casamayor before walking onto one..... Mitchell hasn't beaten anybody anywhere near that sort of level and hasn't exactly looked like the rebirth of Roberto Duran.
:rofl Hope i'm wrong but when this fight was first announced I thought Mitchell had dropped a clanger taking this guy on. Mitchell better not try getting into a war with this guy, he's a monster. Mitchell has to us his skills to box his ears off and he might get a late stoppage/points win. However unless all Mitchells bravado of recent weeks is a smoke screen he is preparing to go to war which is not going to work with Katsidis. :bbb
I'm the same. Fair play to him for taking it, but there are easier fights stylewise for him than a hard punching slugger that can take one back. Outboxing Prescott is a different thing altogether, he even said on here that Prescott doesn't punch as hard as Johanneson - let's not forget he was all but gone in that one.... Katsidis will be harder hitting than that. Again, it's a winnable fight for him, but the odds are stacked a bit much in his favour. I'm not putting much on it, but Katsidis at 6/4 win only is good value.
You guys can say what you like, but i know its a guarantee, if you want to make money just do khan, odds may be crap but don't matter what the odds are, because your making profit at the end of the day.. and you can choose how much you want to make on this fight, I want to make £500 so im going to do £2,000, if you want make £1,000 then you can place £4,000, so you can pretty much choose how much you want to win. Reason why im so confident in Khan because I know Malignaggi is an easy fight, you think they would pick a dangerous fight to make his american debut, purpose of a debut is to look good. Thats why they picked Malignaggi because he is the introduction fight for Khan, Malignaggi is a well know fighter but at the same time a bum that cant crack an egg, Perfect for Khan, if it was a dangerous puncher I wouldn't bring this guarentee rubbish up, but Malignaggi is perfect for Khan.. This is going to be so easy money, I'm suprised the bookies even giving odds for this fight.
What makes you so certain Khan will win? Because he beat the great Salita and Kotelnik and Oisin ***an?
Your exactly like me, I only do betting on boxing because I know im likely to win, I never do horse racing or anything like that, and I'm not into frequent gambling because thats where you get drowned of your Money, I carefully select matches where I feel i can Make Money, Like Pacquiao on points against Clottey, Mayweather on Points against Mosley, Once i even done Winky v Taylor for a draw because I knew their styles could make a draw, I think I placed £20 on that at 20/1 a nice £400 there. with the Khan fight I dont want to do him on Points or knockout because it easily could be either one and 50/50 to loose Money, I rather just go for the Straight win and support him all the way.
So you've tipped Khan on the straights when he's as short as 1/8 and then acted like it's a shrewd bet:roll:Keep loading up on these 'guarantees' son:good