One thing that Pacquiao has over Mayweather when it comes to ATG standing...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by horst, May 12, 2010.


  1. horst

    horst Guest

    I hadn't actually considered this until I read Jim Bagg's response in the June 2010 edition of Ring magazine to someone asking if Jose Luis Castillo would make the Hall Of Fame:

    "...realistically, sorry to say it, Castillo has almost no shot. He was an outstanding fighter from 2000-2005, but he was never a pound-for-pounder. 'El Temible' definitely deserves to have his name on the ballot. But when it comes to getting voted in, it's 'no way Jose' for No Weigh Jose."


    So that left me with the thought:


    In his entire career, Floyd Mayweather has NEVER beaten ONE single HOF standard fighter who was in his prime and at a good weight for him.


    If Bagg is right and Castillo "has almost no shot", then there are no others on Floyd's resume! If Castillo isn't good enough to make the cut, then guys like Corrales and Hatton definitely aren't either. No-one could legitimately argue that De La Hoya or Mosley were in their prime when Floyd fought them, their respective primes were roughly an entire decade earlier!! And Marquez was two divisions above the one he was fighting in, the clash was too far from his natural weight to be considered anything other than a pointless mismatch.


    Compare this to Pacquiao - it cannot even be disputed that he has beaten two prime HOF standard fighters at good weights for them in his career:


    - Marco Antonio Barrera at featherweight in 2003 (MAB in the middle of the best run of form of his life at the time and was ranked p4p#3)


    - Juan Manuel Marquez at superfeather in 2008 (Marquez p4p#3 at the time)


    If Miguel Cotto beats Foreman to become a 3-weight champ, he could be on the way to HOF class himself, making it three. And of course Erik Morales will make the Hall, but even though he was nowhere near as far gone as Pac haters make out, he wasn't prime so can't really be included here.


    You know, people can trot out the boring, stupid stuff like "Pac got KTFO twice" all day long on here, but in the end you are remembered for the prime guys you beat.


    The reason that Ray Robinson is considered an elite ATG is not because he beat an ageing Henry Armstrong, even though Armstrong is a HUGE name. He is remembered for cutting a swathe through the best fighters around in the welterweight and middleweight divisions at the time, prime guys like Kid Gavilan, Carmen Basilio and Jake LaMotta, guys who were later inducted into the HOF because they were great fighters in their own right.

    The reason that Muhammad Ali is considered an elite ATG is not because he beat an ageing Archie Moore, even though Moore is a HUGE name. He is remembered for taking on the very best heavyweights around at the time, prime guys like Sonny Liston, Joe Frazier and George Foreman, guys who were later inducted into the HOF because they were great fighters in their own right.



    If Pacquiao and Mayweather retire without facing each other, Pac already has two HOF fighters on his ledger that he beat in their primes. Floyd does not. This will undoubtedly factor into how history rates these guys. :bbb
     
  2. Caponecartels

    Caponecartels Maritime Lawyer Full Member

    1,903
    5
    Jul 25, 2008
  3. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Marquez was not in his prime when Pacquiao beat him. Yeah, he was p4p #3 at the time, but so was Mosley when Mayweather beat him. Barrera was arguably in his prime. Cotto was arguably on the slide when Pacquiao fought him . This next fight should give a clearer picture of this. In the end, I believe Mayweather and Pacquiao will fight eachother. I believe Mayweather will win decisively, and that will settle any argument on this issue.
     
  4. SupraTT24

    SupraTT24 Heart Of A Champion Full Member

    638
    1
    Jan 18, 2006
    Hatton beat the **** out of castillo, correles split, and had already lost to floyd by then. DLH is two years older, that may not be prime, and he may have been **** against PAC and forbes, but he still looked alot like oscar when he fought may so that point isnt valid either. PACs morreles and berrera were both past it too. so anything you say for floyd goes double for pac cuz he fought FMJ's opponents you listed LATER, AND lighter
     
  5. Caponecartels

    Caponecartels Maritime Lawyer Full Member

    1,903
    5
    Jul 25, 2008
    Still, Mosley was coming off a great win over Margo, was the #1 welterweight
    and most thought the fight would be competitive, at least not as one sided as it turned out to be.

    idk.
     
  6. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    I think when Floyd beat DLH and Shane they both were on the P4P charts.....of course they were not in their physical prime but they were still operating at a high level.

    I don't think anyone doubts who's resume is filled with more substance and depth, but Floyd still has a very good resume......shy of great but VERY good especially with his win over Shane.
     
  7. Stovepipe

    Stovepipe Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,873
    60
    Feb 1, 2007
    yeah Pac fought Marquez at a lighter weight where he was better and Hatton at a weight where he had far more success, what is your point?
     
  8. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    5,899
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    I disagree. Marquez was peak or close to peak. His draw with Pac was probably HIS PEAK (both physically and accomplishments/resume wise). Second, one can argue that Pac was not in his peak in either of those fights. The Pac in the Cotto fight would destroy any version of Marquez. He would eat six KDs in the first few rounds instead of just 3.

    Cotto was not peak but near peak. With a better trainer he could have beaten anybody, including Pac, during that time. The fight with Foreman will prove or disprove this.
     
  9. Young PW

    Young PW Active Member Full Member

    672
    1
    Mar 4, 2010
    neither did pacquaio so you lose....
     
  10. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009
    Watch how the joyboys and the *****s attack this topic. LOL

    This content is protected
     
  11. Young PW

    Young PW Active Member Full Member

    672
    1
    Mar 4, 2010
    this guy OWNED the thread started....well said son
     
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    Irrelevant to the subject of prime HOF opponents.

    Irrelevant to the subject of prime HOF opponents.
     
  13. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    If Marquez was at his peak in 2008, then so was De La Hoya in 2007. I find it hard to believe that Pacquiao is just now entering his peak. Guys who've been fighting pro since they were 16 don't reach their peak at 30, after they've had over 50 fights.
     
  14. horst

    horst Guest

    I disagree. I think Marquez was still prime when Pac fought him. He moved up to p4p#2 AFTER he fought Pac. The only way for Shane Mosley to go now is DOWN.

    Barrera was indeed in his prime. Point proven then.
     
  15. Money7

    Money7 The Best Full Member

    1,440
    2
    Oct 6, 2004
    first two paragraphs was plagarism at it's best... took that from an article i read yesterday... :patsch :rofl