Mike Rossman vs Carl Froch

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Xplosive, May 13, 2010.


  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,331
    9,939
    Jun 23, 2008
  2. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,557
    Jul 28, 2004
    Rossman wins this one. Froch is the most overrated, unskilled guy I've seen in a long time...his 15 minutes of fame may be over BTW. The very underrated Rossman, whose best fight was vs Galindez I, showed far more on the ball than the punch catcher Froch...and incidently, any criticisms of Rossman's win over Galindez attributed to Victor being subpar that night can be countered by referring to the damaged goods that Taylor was when Froch got lucky and ko'ed his gassed opponent. Rossman at best had a cleaner, sharper repetoire of punches..a clearly better arsenal and he was a smarter fighter then Froch, but then, just about anybody is. All Froch, who by the way, suffers from severe delusions of grandeur, has to his credit is his girlfriend.
     
  3. tommy the hat

    tommy the hat Active Member Full Member

    1,151
    9
    Sep 2, 2008
    I totally agree. Rossman would rough Froch up pretty good. Rossman fought in that golden age of light heavyweights and beat a hall of famer in Victor Galindez for the title. Rossman also faced tougher competition and served a tougher apprenticeship coming up than Froch ever did.