Old Greats v New Greats

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by stevo78, May 15, 2010.


  1. SHOTAT

    SHOTAT Scouse House Full Member

    732
    0
    Apr 3, 2010
    lol...

    Do you really believe Mike Tyson had the beating of any heavyweight in history?

    Mike Tyson should be name number 1 on the Over hyped list.
     
  2. stevo78

    stevo78 Active Member Full Member

    1,240
    0
    Apr 27, 2009
    Modern techniques also include things like diet and nutrition which is scientifically new. Also biologists now know a lot more about the physiology of the body hence training techniques have improved.
     
  3. hallelujahholla

    hallelujahholla Original Gangsta Full Member

    896
    0
    Jan 5, 2008
    Prime Ali would KO a prime Wlad...Corrie Sanders touched his chin...Ali found Foreman's chin...he would find Wlad's easily...Wlad hasn't had a win over anyone legitimate since Sam Peter who almost KO'd him 4 **** sake
     
  4. stevo78

    stevo78 Active Member Full Member

    1,240
    0
    Apr 27, 2009
    Back OT can anyone think of any other advantages modern boxers have over older boxers?
     
  5. Meast

    Meast New Member Full Member

    0
    13
    Dec 6, 2008
    I'm still waiting for your list of HW's that Tyson could beat.
     
  6. joe33

    joe33 Guest


    And ? The fact is many did manage to box that long, not to many modern fat as **** heavys would last that long, so how in the blue blazes have modern fighters got a stamina advantage, sam peters and chris arreola are two great examples i will use here, they can barley do the required 10 or 12 before being ****ed, and both are top fighters in todays HW scene no matter what people may say. The old fellas from the past would have ran rings round them for as many rounds as they needed to
     
  7. hallelujahholla

    hallelujahholla Original Gangsta Full Member

    896
    0
    Jan 5, 2008
    Tyson is one of the best in history in his prime without a doubt...although its a stretch to say he could beat Lennox, Ali, Frazier, etc
     
  8. hallelujahholla

    hallelujahholla Original Gangsta Full Member

    896
    0
    Jan 5, 2008
    if the fight with Evander happened in '91, its very possible Tyson could have lost that, too
     
  9. Machine

    Machine Active Member Full Member

    1,128
    0
    Sep 29, 2004

    It's called science.

    I find it astounding that people cannot grasp that improved knowledge of how the body works, the advent of video and slow motion capabilities, and greater dissemination of information and data (such as the most effective techniques) leads to technical improvements in how a sport is practiced. Just as science over time has lead to a greater understanding of the natural world, the same applies to sport. We know how to do it better and now and it will continue to improve. You would never see a guy box or train like a boxer did 150 years ago for example.
     
  10. miggzthatnucca

    miggzthatnucca Active Member Full Member

    1,446
    0
    May 4, 2010
    If Prime foreman vs prime tyson fight 10 times .. I think it'll be 5-5 with 5 k.o. each ... ali would be tyson ... I think prime tyson has a chance against any 1 .. but if he fought ali .. prime holmes ... I think they take him ... but if tyson fights any1 3 times he k.o. them @least once ..
     
  11. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Wald is an exleent boxer who's biggest weekness is his chin. Ali is an exelent boxer who's biggest weekness is his punch. It would be an intresting fight.
    As for Tyson. I think head to head he is the best of the short heavys, and he stands the best chance to beat the taller ones. However Taller boxer types are going to give him probblems.
     
  12. stevo78

    stevo78 Active Member Full Member

    1,240
    0
    Apr 27, 2009
    People laugh their arses off when it was suggested Mayweather should move up and fight Pavlik. Comments like Pavlik is simply too big for Mayweather and he would duck and dive but when he got hit that would be it etc. Well Ali v Wlad is about the same kind of difference in ability as May v Pav the only difference is the relative weight difference.

    A quick calculation (assuming May moved up to fight PAv at 170) May would be up against a guy 16% heavier than him. Where as Ali (say a 210lb prime - maybe generous he often fought lighter than this) against a 245lb Wlad. Would be a 17% weight increase.

    Well the weight difference maybe too much. Note the word MAYBE.
     
  13. stevo78

    stevo78 Active Member Full Member

    1,240
    0
    Apr 27, 2009
    Im not ignoring you Im just having a think about it
     
  14. joe33

    joe33 Guest

    Thats all well and good, butt for example modern heavyweights seem to have gone backwards bar the kits and maybe one or two others, whats the point of knowing all what you just said, and then turning up to fight well over weight, and looking like you have no game plan bar the one, then like most guys that have faced the K Bros, do nothing till you get taking out or your own corner rescue you.

    Come on mate all that video footage, and info means **** all once your in there, and you get hit hard, your brain begins to panic, and you look like ****. Id personally love to see more old school fighters like the men from the past, who fought with real passion, and not all this ultra high tech stuff that seems to be doing **** all for the majority of modern heavy weights. Some bang on about how well prepared they are, and how advanced there training and camp has been, and many have huge teams checking everything they do, and then when you see them fight, well you scratch you head and wonder did they forget through all that training to actually box.

    Compare that to the brutal old school fighters who trained like crazy ****ers, and who had all out wars, or just looked great, and in many cases had 100 fight careers. Obviously that had to change, many like that ended up wrecked, but i do think its gone to extreme, and somethings been lost somewhere.

    Also im using the HW as the main example, due to them being seen as the more interesting fighters to most of the general public in terms of crowds and history, for me its gone a bit backwards there, though there are some great guys about, and i for one would not knock any guy willing to get into the ring
     
  15. stevo78

    stevo78 Active Member Full Member

    1,240
    0
    Apr 27, 2009
    We arent talking about fat bums we are talking about top p4p fighters of today and recent history. e.g. Tyson, Lewis and also I suppose Wlad etc.