Floyd's acknowledged as P4P #1

JMM
Pacquiao's left over; not to mention he skipped 2 weight divisions to fight Fraud, but a good win.

Mosley
Old, shot, overtrained, but a good win.


See, how easy it is to discredit someone? So many morons in this forum.

 

Ah ahhh ahhh ok boss. whatever you say. I'm saying that your post is absolutely ****ing pointless.

 

Marquez was fighting TWO WEIGHTS above his weight class.
Mosley was 38 YEARS OLD and hadn't fought in 16 months.

Floyd is intelligent, on paper these look great but when you anylse them you see the truth. Not exactly pound for pound achievements.

 

Just to say Pacquaio has fought in more weight divisions against MUCH better competition and has fought 2 of the top welters in the division. He's also done a lot more in the last 2 years than Mayweather. The P4P throne is a 'what have you done for me lately' award. Otherwise Ali could come out of retirement and be made number 1

 

Did you even know why I posted that? atsch Again don't be try to be a smart-ass if you're not smart you'll only end up being an ass. You're as bad as ***llege.

Some posters in this forum takes stupidity in another level.

 

Look your right. The p4p rankings don't work like sanctioning body rankings. I agree with you. My point is that all it is the collected opinions of the "experts" they ask at the moment. I could put together a group of thirty people who would rank Will I Am # 1 but that would be a very smart group of experts right? I apologize if I took your comment in the wrong context.

With 4 sanctioning bodies, the Ring magazine, and a few well followed websites all throwing there opinions around, all of this becomes too muddy to discuss intelligently. Belts are being collected, unified and then thrown in the trash. Retirements are rendering it nearly impossible to track the linear champion. Critics such as the Ring mag are correct when they point out the obvious, that back in the 60's things were better. In the 60's if you wanted to know who the champ was you simply looked it up in the newspaper. That was the guy to beat to become the man. It was pretty cool. The problem is that they tried to create a solution to the problem with their own championship policy and have failed miserably because they are relying on the opinions of there own "experts" who are not well informed enough and too biased to make it work. Their own rules are too muddy to be effective and they ignore there rules when it suits them, just like the sanctioning bodies.

In this p4p mess The only objective opinion that I am willing to rely on is the sports book. These guys are campaigning at the same weight, the sports books are running a line and the bettors are voting with cold hard cash.

 

He's been number 1 in my mind unequivocally after beating the guy that Freddie Roach said was "too good" for Pacquiao. You really can't argue with that no matter how hard you try.

 

Some of you Pac fans have to be Brain Dead, @FYTELOD How can you say he is almost there? They very same fighters you are glorifying Pac are fighters that Mayweather have already beaten.(Oscar & Hatton) Pac fans are quick to down play Mayweather's win over JMM saying he was blown up , & Oscar was old, Point forget to point out that Pac fight with Oscar was about 2 years after Mayweather would that make Oscar even older? Also forgetting to point out that Mayweather fight with Oscar was at 154 lbs a weight Pac have never faught at and will never fight at seeing as how he likes catch weight fights like the catch weight drain Oscar,Cotto . So you can't take credit from Mayweather when he fights these guys and give credit to Pac for fighting them after Mayweather.

 

that guy is a another *******...he does anything to put down Floyd and gives him 0 credit for anything...he doesnt know much about anything in boxing beyond pac and a few things goin on around him

 

:good vulnerable? :huh u talkin about the 2nd round? LOL...IF YOUR BASING HIS VULNERABILITY OFF THE 2ND ROUND YOU WAY OFF MAN...

UR IN THE MINORITY IF U THINK HE SHOWED HIMSELF TO BE MORE VULNERABLE THAN USUAL...HE JUST OPENED UP AND WENT TOE TO TOE FOR A BIT...HE SHOULDNT HAVE DONE IT AND HE CORRECTED THE MISTAKE AFTER THE 2ND ROUND...

YEA MAN NOT MANY WILL AGREE WITH YOU IF YOU THINK HE SHOWED VULNERABILITY IN THE RING...EVEN FLOYD CAN GET HIT FLUSH..IT WASNT THE FIRST TIME EITHER..

BTW.....VULNERABLE IN A 11-1 BLOWOUT:huh DO U SAY THE SAINTS LOOK VULNERABLE WHEN THEY BEAT A TEAM 35-7..:think I KNOW THE SCORING IS OPPOSITE IN SUBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE BUT REGARDLESS...LMFAO. ...THIS GUY THINKS CUZ A FIGHTER GETS TAGGED IN A FIGHT HE "VULNERABLE"...ITS PART OF THE SPORT MAN...GET IT RIGHT..B

TW NICE WEBSITE...:good

 

I completely agree with you. I said what I said because apparently the poster that replied to (who clearly is not you) believes that if you're unranked in top 10 P4P and you beat the number N you'll automatically be number N. Also, why you started acting like ass is beyond me.

 

:think

 

Just look at the fighters they both have fought. Pacman disposed of DelaHoya like he was nothing and DelaHoya only lost by split to PBF. Pacman kod Hatton in 2 Took PBF 10. And Pacman beat up on Marquez when they were both lightweights. If Pacman was fighting the same mosely the other night Mosely would have been taken out early. Same with Marquez.And if PBF was fighting Pacman the other night he would have got his ass knocked out. Cause I promise if Mosely can catch PBF Pacman could do it and finish it.

 

:good...then youll hear them saying delahoya was weightdrained etc etc,...both fighters have some bad arguements on their win...but atleast, the way i see it, mayweather wins in points while pac is knocking them out cold and stuff..