Who fought the Stronger Competition? Larry Holmes or Joe Louis?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by emallini, May 19, 2010.


  1. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,274
    2,538
    Mar 16, 2008
    Both fought alot of average fighters in their Title runs. Who fought the better guys?
     
  2. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    The Brown Bomber
     
  3. Shane W

    Shane W Former Heavyweight Full Member

    1,098
    1
    Apr 11, 2010

    Definately Louis, the competetion even if Joe made most look like crap was better. Think about the skill of Schmeling KOing the unbeaten Louis after being "ruined" by brutal KOes. Another thought the MENTAL TOUGHNESS of fighters was better, nowadays 1 bad loss and fighter is "ruined" but Max bounced back from brutal beatings to beat the best fighter on the planet at that time BY KO. Then the "ruined" Joe BLEW Max out in a round in the rematch. Fighters were physically and mentally tougher in the Brown Bombers era. NO DOUBT!!!!!! Any one understand what I am getting at. Cotto "ruined" after 1 loss. Hatton "ruined" after 1 loss. Pavlik "ruined" after 1 loss. Khan "ruined" ( won't fight a puncher his size yet) after 1 loss. I think fighters claiming they are the ones that "ruined" fighters are just tooting thier own horns because they want to take away the accomplishment of the fighter that beat them next. I think we will find that Cotto is not "ruined" but he just got beat by a CHEATER once and a guy just better than him the second time. I guess Puritty, Sanders and Brewster "ruined" Wlad??? No Wlad is mentally tougher than given credit for!!!:hi:
     
  4. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    Definetly holmes.
     
  5. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    Louis technically fought ALL Cruiserweights with few exceptions
     
  6. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    I know exactly what you mean, which is why I give alot of credit to guys who come back from bad losses- either knockouts or wide UD's- to overcome it and become a better fighter. It's up to fans to recognize that, too. We're part of the problem because 50 years ago, fans didn't mind a few losses on the way up- now, the instant a fighter loses their 0, they're yesterday's news and everyone uses words like "exposed" and "ruined".

    What gets lost in all that is that attitude from us, the people paying the fighters' salaries, leads to worse fights getting made because fighters don't want to risk losing their backing off of a bad night's work, or the great night's work from his opponent. The less we punish guys for losing, the more good fights we'll see.

    I picked Louis for this, by the way. :thumbsup
     
  7. darling dame

    darling dame Active Member Full Member

    1,070
    3
    Dec 8, 2009
    Shane W you know your stuff &analyze it clearly.
     
  8. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
  9. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    ugh, I voted Louis. But with second thought I think Holmes. If the question is who BEAT stronger competition then it's Louis. But Holmes later fought on against Mercer, McCall, and then lost to Holyfield and Tyson.
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,185
    83,083
    Nov 30, 2006
    Louis had the stronger title run.
     
  11. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Yeah he did But Louis later Fought Marciano and Charles, not quite as good as Holy and Tyson but both are ATGs.