Has Pacman fought anybody as good as Mosley?

You'd have to ask Miguel since he asked for the fight at 145.

 

Yes he has.

Juan Manuel Marquez
Marco Antonio Barrera
Eric Morales
Miguel Cotto

All easily better than the Mosley Mayweather fought when Paquiao fought them. That's without digging back too far into his record. Didn't he fight Oscar Larios back when he was still good too, and beat him easily?

 

:deal this sums it all up.

 

2003 Barrera
2006 Morales
2009 Cotto
2008 Marquez
2001 Ledwaba
1998 Sasakul

All better than 2010 Mosley, in my opinion. I thought the lay off and age factor really showed in the fight itself on May 1st.

 

no he agreed to the fight at 145, make no mistake about it Freddie Roach asked for it.

 

miguel cotto only cause pac has only fought 3 times above 140. but over-all, jmm, barrera and morales are much better fighters than the mosley version that floyd fought.

 

lmfao..this is HATERIZM AT ITS BEST...

ITS CALLED "STYLES MAKE FIGHTS" FELLAZ...JUST CUZ ONE GUY LOOKS AWESOME WITH A CERTAIN OPPONENT OR STYLE DONT MEAN HE'LL LOOK THE SAME...THE WIDE PUNCHES THAT WERE LANDING ON TONY WERE MISSING BY "INCHES" ON FLOYD..WHY??? CUZ FLOYD KNOWS HOW TO SLIP AND MOVE AND NOT BLOCK PUNCHES WITH HIS CHIN LIKE TONYhi:

THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF A HATER AND SOMEONE WHO DONT GIVE CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE..."AFTER THE MARGARITO FIGHT SHANE IS A BEAST BUT NOW WE ARE ALL JUST FOOLED":rofl

U CLOWNS EVER STOP TO THINK THAT FLOYD JUST WHOOPS ON THESE GUYS..GIVE CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE ..

 

the morales that beat manny in the first fight was a better fighter than shane..not the one that pac beat in the 2nd and 3rd fights

 

lol..sasakul and ledwaba weren't...cotto either...lmfao...morales in 2006...lol he wasnt better than shane...the morales that beat manny in 2005 was better than shane..not the one in the 2nd or 3rd fight

 

The Morales from the 2nd fight is definately better

 

U GUYS SAY IT YOURSELF..."YOUR ONLY AS GOOD AS YOUR LAST FIGHT" MORALES WAS COMING OFF THE LOSS TO RAHEEM...PRETTY ONE SIDED...SHANE HAD JUST BEAT THE WW CHAMP AND THE MAN CONSIDERED BY MOST TO BE THE MAN TO BEAT AT WW....

ILL TAKE A NUMBER 3 LB 4 LB SHANE MOSLEY OVER THE MORALES FROM THE 2ND FIGHT ANYDAY..YEA MAN LOSING TO RAHEEM DONT MAKE UR ARGUMENT LOOK GOOD PHILLA:good

 

Yeah Cotto, who had a clear win over Mosley.

 

I'd still put the Cotto that fought Pacquiao above Mosley.
Mosley was a tough opponent, no doubt, but only because of his power. Most people knew... if there was any way of Mosley winning, it was by knocking out Mayweather.

Now... he wasn't far from doing that. Unluckily for him though... this happened in the early rounds. I don't see Mayweather's chin as good, he was holding on for dear life after that punch. But being in the early rounds, he was able to recover completely.

 

you said in the above quote that some people cant give credit where its due...But you cant give credit to pacs accomplishment, which were definitely better wins than a 38 yr old past prime weakened mosley...

and oh STFU YOU WHINNY *****!!!:|:|:|

 

You talking about the punch in the 2nd round that buckled his legs? ...yeah that was a temple shot.