The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    No, but Marnoff likes having pointless semantic debates by the looks of things, under the auspices of "knowing the truth".
     
  2. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    22
    Feb 14, 2006
    Right.
     
  3. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Nope. Great post.
     
  4. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    i have read many of your posts, and you seem fairly reasonable, so please

    1. show me where the floyd-mosley cutoff was 18-days (it was random, and USADA chose 18 days, not floyd or mosley, and they very well could have tested at 1 day if they felt the need)

    2. please show me a legit source of the current terms being negotiated
     
  5. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    22
    Feb 14, 2006
    Again, if I've been wrong in any of my points, demonstrate that. I get the feeling you would have already if you could. Oh well.
     
  6. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    so...if it's that easy, let's see a link
     
  7. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    You are. You're arrogantly proclaiming to know more than other people. You've read the same articles as the rest of us so, unless you can conjure up a prolific source, keep the patronising diatribes to a minimum please.
     
  8. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    For someone who likes to debate semantically, you're failing miserably here. Read slower, and with less anger.
     
  9. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    22
    Feb 14, 2006
    If I've been wrong in correcting people, demonstrate that. If not, you have no ground to stand on in terms of suggesting I've been arrogant about claiming to know more than others.
     
  10. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    22
    Feb 14, 2006
    So then you're unable to correct anything I've said?
     
  11. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    I'd like to think you are deliberately miscontruing my posts (final solace of the damned) but I have my doubts.
     
  12. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    22
    Feb 14, 2006
    Yawn. Thought so.
     
  13. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Most sensible thing you've said. I'll let you get back to patronsing these kids who don't know better.;)
     
  14. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    22
    Feb 14, 2006
    Sure, and if you find a way to show that I don't in fact know better, make sure to demonstrate it. Until then, adios.
     
  15. boxingscience

    boxingscience Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,873
    305
    Feb 5, 2010
    1) i've read from a few sources that there was a cut off date of 18 days for the floyd-mosley fight. i'm not sure of the circumstances, or the inside story, but conte said there was a cut off date of 18 days. maybe i read it wrong.

    2) i don't know what the current negotiations are like, all we can go by is what floyd is currently saying. the last things that have been said is pacquiao is apparantly saying he'll accept a 14 day cut off, which seems reasonable to me, and floyd is saying he'll only accept if the random tests are done up to the day of the fight knowing pacquiao won't agree to that.

    i personally think 14 days is fair enough.

    i just want this fight to happen, and i hope floyd goes back and says
    " yeah, 14 days is fair enough".
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.