What is ur HW top 10?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Shaolin-Abbot, May 27, 2010.


  1. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    He is not on top of my list. I have no lists anymore. I had him Top15. Like Liston. And I think that´s justifyable (does this word exist?).
    No, I don´t give fighters with slow hands extra credit. You can compensate this with timing and accuracy but how do you compensate a size disadvantage :huh
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007

    Fighting small, fighting out of a crouch, working the body, stayng inside, giving only the top of the head, it all depend upon who you are figting. Obviously a Patterson would have to change this around when he's fighting somebody smaller, like Moore.

    It's very obviously a dis-advantage that certain strategies and strengths can overcome, like slower hand-speed.
     
  3. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    Of course it can be overcome but that´s not what I said. I wrote compensate. And for a reason. You can overcome a size disadvantage with certain styles and tactics. But you have to take more risks with that. You can compensate slower hands with better accuracy and timing. You don´t need to take more risks for that.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007

    Alright, well you can compensate for that disadvanatage by doing all those things I said, if you prefer, though I don't see the difference. Yes, they are stragies that empoy risk,but so what? Why does fighting riskier to overcome disadvantages make a fighter greater or better?
     
  5. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    The difference between overcoming and compensating is that for the first one you need to overcome adversity. Here a size disadvantage. And yeah, overcoming adversity is a sign of greatness.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007

    :huh

    Come on, having slow hand doesn't need to be overcome? Having no power doesn't need to be overcome? It's just a question of nipping and tucking the tactics?

    When two heavweights fight, you think the difference in size is the most significan factor, the one that needs to be "overcome" as opposed to "compensated for"?
     
  7. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,259
    Feb 6, 2009
    thats not a bad list at all:good
     
  8. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    Depends on the size gap and on the range. For example it´s harder to overcome for a 180 pounder against a 200 pound fighter than for a 230 pound fighter against a 250 pound fighter due to the "diminishing returns". And yeah, I think it is a major factor then - and fighters who are able to make it a non-factor should be credited for that.
    The difference is for one you have to take risk, for the other not. You need to take more risks to overcome a size gap. you don´t need to take more risks to compensate for slow hands/no power.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007

    So, you rate Patterson as highly as Liston in part because he suffers from a physical disadvantage, which makes it harder for him to win fights - and to overcome that, he has to take more risks than a fighter with little power or slow hands. Is that right?
     
  10. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    No. Read my previous posts. It´s a factor but just one.

    btw I rate both as high as Louis and Ali these days since all of them are genuine hw atgs and I don´t make a difference between these anymore.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007

    Sure, it's a factor, that's what I meant.

    Seems the absolute height of bizarre to me, but to each his own. I take it you rank Tyson very high? He was considerably smaller than Patterson was in comparisn to most of his opponents.
     
  12. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    259
    Oct 22, 2009
    I rank him above Patterson and Liston for sure.

    Like I said I don´t do lists anymore but when judging a fighter you´ve got to look at these factors as well - IMO.
     
  13. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    3,980
    18
    Jun 24, 2007
    1. Ali
    2. Louis
    3. Marciano
    4. Holmes
    5. Johnson
    6. Lewis
    7. Holyfield
    8. Frazier
    9. Tyson
    10. Liston
     
  14. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    nice list
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007
    01 - Muhammad Ali
    02 - Joe Louis
    03 - Lennox Lewis
    04 - Sonny Liston
    05 - Larry Holmes
    06 - Joe Frazier
    07 - Rocky Marciano
    08 - George Foreman
    09 - Mike Tyson
    10 - Evander Holyfield
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.