i love a great ko as much as the next guy, but i also love a boxing lesson where you hit and make them miss. w. klitschko just beats a man down with his jab because he's a master of the distance in the ring, it is a beautiful thing. to say (from the haters) that he wouldn't beat anybody without his height and reach........is just a plain stupid thing to say! it's called learning the trade and using what you have, if he can't use his height and reach then haye should pull his punches because it gives him an advantage, or Ali should have slowed down so he wasn't faster that his opponents. all fighter try to use what they have to better their opponent - it's a fact. don't fault a fighter for being good at what he/she is getting paid to do.
You are right. I'm not saying Wlad isn't boring, but people who say he isn't talented are talking through their rear orifice. Wlad utilises his physical advantages better than any fighter in the last 30 years.
its just no fun watching most fights when you know the opponent has no chance...the klits (especially wlad) are as good as most of the opponents are oridinary with that said , it would be nice for them to KO guys like chambers in rd 5 rather than play with such a small guy for all that time...its just their style and what works works...
its just no fun watching most fights when you know the opponent has no chance...the klits (especially wlad) are as good as most of the opponents are oridinary but with that said a quick ko is great but his style now leads to longeveity - w. klitschko will reign as long as he wants to. and what about a superheavyweight class will that make the haters happy
