Jo Jo Dan robbed in Istambul

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by aliviu_emilian, Jun 5, 2010.


  1. I scored it 116-110 for Jo Jo. The fight wasn't close.
     
  2. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    Its fights like this and the Sylvester-Karmazin fight the reason why i always check where the fight is taking place before i make a pick.
     
  3. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
    I didn't see the fight, but at least the scorecards were reasonable, but IDK I haven't seen the fight yet so may'be it was a flat out robbery.
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,359
    83,222
    Nov 30, 2006
    From what I read, and watching the tail end of it and putting 2 and 2 together, it seems to be more a case like Pac-JMM 2.

    The decision went the wrong way, but was close enough that a strong word like robbery might not be appropriate.
     

  5. The fight wasn't ****ing close. Aydin won three rounds.
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,359
    83,222
    Nov 30, 2006
    OK! Don't jump down my throat, like I said I tuned in very late (championship rounds). Just going by the RBR reports, it sounded to be close...
     
  7. DemolitionDan

    DemolitionDan ATG and HoF Full Member

    17,643
    10
    Jun 29, 2009
    Yea, exactly. Perfect post. Couldn't have said it any better.
     
  8. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    the decision did not go the wrong way for Pac vs JMM II

    LOL talk about a free shot.
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,359
    83,222
    Nov 30, 2006
    :yep IMO, Juan nicked it by a point.

    Again, though - the point of the post was that I didn't scream robbery even though my card read differently than the official ones. It was too close to call it a robbery. That sounds like it may have been the case here as well.

    Hopefully the video is published online so we can all see it soon.
     
  10. aliviu_emilian

    aliviu_emilian Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,714
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    Diplomate robbery is good for you?
     
  11. aliviu_emilian

    aliviu_emilian Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,714
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    FROM WHAT YOU READ???

    Man, I think you`re serious.Here are peple who watched the match entirely.
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,359
    83,222
    Nov 30, 2006
    Neither of these posts seem to make sense. What are you trying to articulate, exactly?

    Yes, I missed most of the fight, while watching the card in Germany instead. The last two rounds (round and a half) were all my own two eyes witnessed. So I readily admit not being in a great position to comment on it, until such time as the fight is published on Youtube or something so we can all see it, all of us who missed it live.

    Until then, the only possible basis of opinion formation is the little bit viewed live, and yes, reading the round-by-round reports from earlier.

    Why are we confused about this?
     
  13. TYSON DURAN

    TYSON DURAN ******************** Full Member

    1,376
    0
    May 13, 2010
    JJ Dan did more than enough to win. He out boxed him in a scrappy fight. Not many clean blows landed. Aydin fought like Abraham without the offensive brutality.

    Unimpressed by both fighters
     
  14. Big_Bill_Bronzy

    Big_Bill_Bronzy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,546
    3
    Apr 23, 2009
    **** no. Froch-Kessler was a real close decision. That was not ****ing close. Dan CLEARLY!
     
  15. aliviu_emilian

    aliviu_emilian Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,714
    0
    Jul 18, 2009

    Man, I think that if somobedy is confused, is not me?

    If thee is a theft, even small, theft remains.So I think my first answer has plenty of sense.

    My second post you question about is very clear from even your answers: you CAN`T HAVE A DEFINITIVE CONCLUSION YET.So why you jump to thOSE conclusions including other match as comaparison?Another poster rejected your comparison as well...

    Just wait to see it first.I included in my posts other information wich
    support that assumption...

    Man, don`t take me with "have no sense".You don`t know me.Do you think you discuss with a kid?