Pac-Cotto II at a catchweight of 148 for the 154 Title. Is it Moral?

As I have said in other threads, I think Cotto is a bit more competitve against Pac if the fight is at 154. I still think Pac would probably take it, but it would be a lot more difficult. I originaly thougt he whips his ass easily, no matter the weight... I change my mind after rewatching Pac-Cotto and Cotto-Foreman.


But I doubt this fight would ever happen at 154. I think Roach would ask for - and receive - a catchweight somewhere near 150. First of all, I think it would be plain dispicable for Pac to just use Cotto as a Catchweighted Revolving Door for collecting belts in multiple divisions.:-(


If I was in Cotto's corner (imagine that ****!) I would be dead against anymore fights with Pac if he can't just fight at the maximum weight, especially if there is another belt involved. If he wants to be recognized historically for the achievement of winning all these belts, he should do it the way most others do.


As far as the fight itself? At any weight below 152 or 153, Pac whips his ass 10 out of 10. If Cotto fights at 154, without some type of rehydration clause (I don't know if there was one the past?) I think he would give Pac all he can handle and more.


147 - Pac TKO10
154 - Pac Controversial SD

 

Thats the exact same thing I was saying last night.
I can see some bull**** like that happening.

 

Catchweight of welterweight for the LMW title :rofl That'll be right up Pac's alley

 

That would be terrible.

 

No catchweight is fair.

**** every catchweight.

 

It would be more competitive at 154 but I think 150 would be a more level playing field.

There is no way that Pac is at his best if he fights at 154, he's at his best at 140.

So basically to answer your question - for a fair fight, fight at a catchweight or at 147. For a competitive fight, fight at 154.



The first fight was a fair fight anyways

 

Yall are some sorry ass dudes... Coming up with some corny ass hypothetical **** to bash a fighter... Talk about whats really going on..

 

Not sure what you mean by 'fair' here.

Any fight where the same conditions apply to both fighters is 'fair'.

The only time it's unfair is when you see one fighter make the contracted weight and the other doesn't bother.

 

Shut yo emotional ass up! No one is bashing Pac. You Pac fans act like smeone can't question one sinlge thing about him without bashing. Goo grief.


And you act like He hasn't gathered a belt from Cotto below the maximum weight before.

This content is protected

 

Just read at the s**ne that Cotto is not opposed to the rematch @147 ..Even though Manny owned him I will still root for Cotto just for trying to avenge that loss if he gets the chance again ..

 

Man, as frustrating and annoying as the catchweight topic sounds..i wouldnt put that past Freddy Roach. But if it goes through i wouldnt blame or take away from PAC because its up to Cotto to set some standards.

 

Specially as you see quite a bit of Pac fans wanting Cotto to rematch Manny so Manny can win his 8th title.

 

:rofl Damn nukka you have me laughing out loud for real with what you said in regards to the highlighted part.

 

Exactly. Those threads were some of te first ones to pop up!



What's that one? "Cotto vs. Pac is next!" or some **** like that? I mean seriously.. Win the title at 154.

 

The way I see it... If Cotto wants to fight Pacquiao again, he should be willing to put his title on the line at a catchweight. If he isn't willing to put his title on the line at a catchweight, then he should fight someone his own size.