A fast starter or a strong finisher...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by onourway, Jun 12, 2010.


  1. onourway

    onourway Haye KTFO1 Wlad Full Member

    5,774
    3
    Mar 31, 2008
    Which is the best to be.....
     
  2. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    Sergio Martinez is the MAN at 154 and 160, and he's a strong finisher who often starts relatively slow.
     
  3. fytelod

    fytelod Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,310
    1
    Nov 17, 2009
    Pacquiao is a fast starter AND a strong finisher. ;) ;)

    3... 2... 1...
     
  4. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    Most of the time a strong finisher will win if he can just weather the storm in the early rounds
    Holifield-Tyson is a good ref
     
  5. Keueng

    Keueng Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,304
    1
    Jul 28, 2009
    Against pavlik he was both, he started strong, faded a little bit in the mid rounds, and came back on top :good
     
  6. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    Fighting is about how you finish, winning or losing, not how you start. A slow starter can be costly if taken advantage of, but being a strong finisher will help get the job done down the stretch when the opponent is not as fresh. If a good starter gasses or has his best moments early on, who knows what awaits. Fighters who coast tend to lose in the later rounds if they don't have anything left after expending so much early on.
     
  7. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    If you're a boxer or a swarmer, then it's best to be a strong finisher.

    If you're a slugger, it's best to be a fast starter.
     
  8. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,346
    6
    Feb 14, 2010
    depends on the strengths of the fighter. good conditioning and the drive to fight a full fight don't hurt any fighter but **** that's easier said than done.

    things like the tempo of the fight and how hurt you are can change a fighter's ability to finish strong dramatically.
     
  9. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    15,033
    5
    May 26, 2008
    Wlell it's best to be both so you don't drop a ****ing decision in the end... but t also depends on long the fight goes. If the fight is a 4 rounder or goes to an early technical decision it's best to start quick isn't it?
     
  10. Akxtinguish

    Akxtinguish Belt holder Full Member

    3,659
    1
    Dec 6, 2007
    Strong finisher.

    Ugly Boy Floyd is a good example. He uses the first 4-5 rounds to measure his opponent, figure them out, see what they've got and what kind of a gameplan they bring with them, and then he goes to work on them after that.
     
  11. arashid18

    arashid18 New Member Full Member

    24
    0
    Dec 19, 2009
    It depends really. counter puncher starts slow and is very vulnerable but after that can usally be dominating once they feel comfortable. A boxer has to have the same workrate contantly. If you look when marquez fought manny he was ropped 3 times in the first round but after that was owning manny with perfectly timed hooks and right hands.

    Thomas hearns would of beat floyd in 3 rounds
     
  12. SportsLeader

    SportsLeader Chilling Full Member

    9,226
    5
    May 29, 2010
    Winky Wright's a bit of a sloppy finisher, probably cost him some decisions.
     
  13. punchy kel

    punchy kel Member Full Member

    180
    0
    Feb 22, 2010
    strong finisher- every time for me
     
  14. kwyjibo

    kwyjibo O RLY? banned Full Member

    1,194
    0
    Oct 15, 2009
    A strong finisher. No question.
     
  15. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    I would rather be a Froch than a Taylor if that answers your question.