That Fighter of the Decade award sure is gonna look out of place on Pacquaio's shelf

I disagree, Im sure you will change your mind directly after the fight.

 

but yet he holds a tittle at 147, fought three times above 140, and oh has a 147 trinket.

your not telling the truth....your making size wayyyyyy to much an issue....you actually came out your mouth and said A GREAT FIGHTER is EXPECTED to lose because of his size...and a size difference that is very very marginal at best.

stop with the bullshyt

 

:good

 

would you be more at peace with truth if i say that pac and floyd are of the same size naturally? coz i am not. i already said that floyd will get credit but it is just the way it is.

i am not saying pac is expected to lose just because of size alone. one of the other thing i am concerned is style's which imo floyd holds too. for other floyd fans, they think floyd has the much better skills but i disagree, they are of the same skill level imo.

 

On the same skill level? Really?

 

yes of course you are laughing because you floyd's nuts on your throat but i think they are of far when skills is concerned. the only difference is pac has made use of it more than floyd.

 

I really am not a Floyd nuthugger, I just tell it like it is. Even an ignorant person like you knows that Floyd is more gifted and has greater skills.

 

come on...who is the more versatile of the two?

 

from your mouth....:deal

 

:rofl:rofl BUSTED! Why did he suddenly change his mind then?

 

nah, you only have this notion because floyd is a boxer. but pac's skill is not far off specially now with all the improvements he has made. pac's defense is underrated. pac can mix punche's and has a very good / great ring generalship. pac has great foot movement and boxing technique. and not to mention he is currently one of the best finisher if not the best in the game. pac is also versatile coz he can fight you with any plan in roach's tactics.

 

i am saying this because people have a notion of this. i should have made myself clearer in the first place. but yes you can quote me coz if people thinks floyd is better skilled then maybe they are right. but i do not believe it. that only advantage i had floyd here is styles and size.

good job pointing it out, but my point still is valid.

 

he went up to 147 for the dlh fight. going back down fast to 135 would have been a bad move. just like jones dropped down too fast after winning heavyweight title and it affected him physically. pacquiaos prime weight is 140, marquez prime weight is 130-135lbs. pac fought him there gotta win and a draw. at 140 pac wins easily!!! it wasnt as though pac didnt take any risks, dlh was a risk after a sd with mayweather, hatton was 140 champ and unbeaten at 140. cotto was a massive risk and this forum had loads of people saying cotto was gonna destroy pac. clottey wasnt a risk i will concur that. but pacman went for the money fights which i dont blame him for doing.

 

Who's greater, Duran or Hearns?

 

Jacory, can you get both of mayweathers balls in your mouth at the same time?