That Fighter of the Decade award sure is gonna look out of place on Pacquaio's shelf

No its not thats why, had Pac not got his ass beaten he would have giving Marquez a 3´rd fight, but it was to high of a risk. And I thought Pac was the peoples champion, turns out he is fighting for money.

 

Its not the same dumbass, JMM has not been knocking out bigger guys and carrying his weight and muscle up withoug looking fat. Pac has done it, thats why weight isnt a factor.

 

it's not the same of course with pac and jmm but the fact is pac is still naturally smaller. even if pac is as effective at 147 it doesn't mean he is natural at the weight. we have seen how clottey, cotto and oscar needed too many punches just to get stopped or rattled by pac.

 

HE DIDNT GET HIS ASS BEATEN YOU MORON. he won 1 fight and drew another. just because u have it scored differently you cant take that away from him. rules are rules there was 3 judges and pac won the 2nd fight. course its a risk yes, every fights a risk he cant just keep fighting marquez. what if he won a controversial 3rd fight. fight him again??? he sealed his legacy by beating dlh, hatton and cotto. cant u work that out. beating marquez at 135 wouldnt have given him a shot at mayweather now maybe.

 

Its not true, Cotto was knocked down as soon Pac landed a hard shot, (which not many has done to Cotto) Clottey was to scared to open up or else he would have gotten knocked out, and DLH has a great great chin.

 

A 3´rd fight would have settled it no matter what the outcome would be. And Yes Pac did get his ass beat in most of the fights, had he not gotten the knockdowns, Marquez would have won clearly, but regardless of the knockdowns I think Marquez won.

 

he had no problem doing so with Oscar or asking Cotto for 145...

and Mosley went after Pac and Roach and team deam him too tough...although he did sign fight Cotto...at 145.

 

Why does this ****** thread have 10 pages?

 

Because people like you ask stupid questions like the one you asked.

 

If you're the People's Champ, which fight would you pursue? A fight at 147 where you are a 2 to 1 underdog or a fight at 135 where you are the 2 to 1 favorite?

I think a People's Champ will always go for tough challenges for the entertainment and satisfaction of large number of paying fans.

 

well we all have our own oppinions and like i said before i thought marquez won that 2nd fight. unfortunately for JMM had he not got floored 4 times he would have won both fights. but the Facts in this argument are that Pacquiao won. for u to discredit pac on knocking an excellant fighter down 4 times is absurd. why doesnt he get credit for knocking down a prime JMM in his best weight class down 4 times in 2 fights?

 

Everybody wanted to see a third fight with Marquez. A peoples champion would have made the Marquez fight instead of fighting for money.

 

Because he floored him 4 times and couldnt finish him of and got outboxed, thats why.

 

yep ok pacquiao is **** u happy. so mayweathers **** now aswell cos he knocked down an overweight marquez and couldnt finish him off.
Pac couldnt finish him off because JMM is a warrior with an excellant chin, fast hands and great defence. its no discredit to pac u fool!

 

it may be the case but it's more because he caught cotto properly. with the amount of punishment cotto took, it would be stopped much earlier if pac was more a natural welter. it is also the same in the case of oscar and clottey.