Why did Joe Frazier not fight Sonny Liston?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Nigel_Benn, Jun 13, 2010.


  1. Nigel_Benn

    Nigel_Benn Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,067
    220
    Apr 11, 2005
    Was Liston before Fraziers time? Im not saying a prime Liston but a fight around 1967-68?
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,949
    48,004
    Mar 21, 2007
    Why didn't anybody?

    Liston was banned for a time after Ali II. He was a persona non-gratis in boxing when his ban was finally lifted (and he was never to fight in NY). Liston was at no time champion, #1 contender to Frazier's title or a barrier to his challanging for the title.
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,126
    13,065
    Jan 4, 2008
    Liston at that time was the very defintion of someone you want to keep a young prospect away from.
     
  4. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    Yeah. Futch knew better.
     
  5. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Better yet, Yank Durham knew better not to fool with the aging but powerful Liston in 1967 or '68........ Plus, Frazier's shyster team of "Cloverlay" was still trying to make Frazier into a star while banking big bucks on Joe...... Cloverlay was paying Frazier's bills in hopes that Frazier would pan out as a fighter...... Frazier would eventually go solo after winning the title...... Also, Yank Durham checked-out somewhere around 1972.....

    MR.BILL
     
  6. Caponecartels

    Caponecartels Maritime Lawyer Full Member

    1,903
    5
    Jul 25, 2008
    If he had, how do you guy's think it would have went?
     
  7. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    It depends on how well fit Liston was in '67 or '68....... Liston for sure was good enough and powerful enough to stop Frazier...... BUT! If Liston comes in bored and disinterested, Frazier out-works Liston over 10 rds pretty handidly.....

    MR.BILL:deal
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,949
    48,004
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well Liston thought it was the easiest fight out there for him. At the back of McMurray he said it would be "like shooting fish in a barrel."
     
  9. Caponecartels

    Caponecartels Maritime Lawyer Full Member

    1,903
    5
    Jul 25, 2008

    Interesting.
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,570
    27,213
    Feb 15, 2006
    It would have been a high risk low reward fight.

    Fraziers team were not fools so they steered him clear of it.

    You might have questioned their judgment if they had taken the fight.
     
  11. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    Hard to say, liston was still a force, and would've been able to fight Frazier. Considering how green and fresh Frazier was, I think Liston may be able to outpoint him...Maybe with a knockdown on the way, considering Bonavana knocked Frazier down TWICE. Liston wasn't a great finisher by this time, but could still brawl, and slug like the old liston... Minus the speed. He still had the punch.
    I think Liston would beat Frazier at this time, if he comes in fit, and prepared. 220 seems good for an OLD Liston.
     
  12. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    In '63/64, how hard did he think a fight with Clay would be though?
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,949
    48,004
    Mar 21, 2007

    Easier, for sure. I don't think he every really relished the prospect of Ali though...he knew it would be a circus at best. He speaks about "not having to look for" Frazier.
     
  14. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    Ali is much more of a styleistic problem then Frazier would've been. Frazier-Liston would've been a brawl.
     
  15. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,047
    Apr 1, 2007
    I really can't wrap my mind around why Sonny is so highly thought of post Ali II.

    Who did he beat? Is it being assumed he was %75, even %50 of the fighter he was in his prime?

    He certainly never proved it against any world class fighters from losing the Ali rematch to his death. Knocking out the likes of 15-16 Dave Bailey and 20-28 Sonny Moore and 20-30 Sonny Moore just doesn't do it for me.

    Seems like he went the route of many ex-world champions and simply fought cans, trying to build himself back up into a marketable name after a shameful loss.

    Honest question, what did he prove in 67-70?