how much more would calzaghe have to do to get the respect he deserves?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bigdan, Jun 11, 2010.


  1. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,980
    3,110
    Dec 11, 2009
     
  2. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    dawson....super 6 winner....one other opponent...plus a tune up ..those 3 guys all in a row after a comeback tune up...:good
     
  3. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,980
    3,110
    Dec 11, 2009
     
  4. Big Left

    Big Left Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,243
    20
    Dec 12, 2009
    if joe came back and beat either dawson or the super 6 winner it would be an amazing feat.

    as it stands joe was a great champion and the best swm of all time.
     
  5. bleed_oil

    bleed_oil Active Member Full Member

    815
    1
    May 10, 2009
    :lol: seriously you believe that ??
    Based on beating whom exactly?
     
  6. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010

    A start would be by fighting "Any" world class fighter near their prime. He did this one time in his career verses Kessler. Lacy would almost qualify but he simply isn't a good enough fighter. The best thing he could have done is left behind 168 for 175 sooner and faced any real opponent.
     
  7. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
     
  8. RobertV77

    RobertV77 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,001
    4
    Apr 7, 2010
     
  9. johnnykoolkid

    johnnykoolkid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,109
    0
    May 25, 2010
    prime this prime that, you cant go back in history and pull fighters out of their primes, and if they thought they had a strong chance of losing then they wouldnt have fought calzaghe in the first place, all of these fighters you listed thought that they had a great chance of winning, so with that being said, a victory over roy jones is just that a VICTORY OVER ROY JONES:happy
     
  10. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006

    No, this kind of statement has been proven to be false all throughout boxing history.

    When a fighter is been proven to be way past their best, a win loses significance and magnitude.

    Especially when the fighter was starched even worse by lesser fighters 4 years prior, and when the victor makes prior statements about how he knows the fighter is shot before he fights him.
     
  11. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    I still see people just saying fight xx or xx yet no one is saying how. These people DID NOT want to fight, how can you fight someone that wont fight you. Im not saying they all ducked him but for one reason or other most of the names people say he should have fought had 0 interest in fighting him.
     
  12. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    I agree... Most of it was just bad timing I think. People are way too quick to say duck duck duck, just because certain fights didn't happen when certain fighters were around at the same time.
     
  13. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    Yep 100% and i mean that for both calzaghe and the people some suggest ducked him aswell. Boxing is a buisiness and a lot of it is about getting the right fight at the right time foe the right money sadly.
     
  14. bigdan

    bigdan Guest

    agreed, there isn't one boxer out there who never fought a fight he thought could win to help his record or career....:thumbsup
     
  15. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    yep, it is sad, but at some of the points there with some of the fighters the money just was not there for the risk at the time.