even if he wont make much money fighting other fighters, floyd is just making up excuses to duck him, so why give in?
lol agreed this subject is plain ****. In an article, Pacquiao has said the fight is on if its a 50/50 split. Is this an unreasonable demand? So... if his opponent demands a 60/40 cut instead, does that make it reasonable? As MY personal Peoples Champion, i would expect him to demand nothing LESS than what is fair to him. 40/60 is not fair to him, and he's not to be played out as a secondary chump in front of everyone. 50/50 is universally fair to all, except to Mayweather and his devotees. So... we got Pacquiao saying that he'll fight if there's a 50/50 split. And we got Mayweather holding out for a 60/40 cut..... exactly who's the chump in this picture? Someone's obviously the champ and someone's the chump. If this fight goes through, Mayweather will stand to be completely discredited and will permanently lose any P4P standings. Pacquiao will forever be rated higher than him till proven otherwise. And it will be the last taste of his boxing legacy, first avoiding Pacquiao with additional bull**** testings thats not even sanctioned, and using his want to take more than his fair share of earnings as a stumbling block to prevent a Dangerous fight for him....
lol..diehard pbf fans are really funny..60-40 is generous?so what is fair for both?70-30?damn these guys are out of their effin mind..
For fuk sakes! these guys are fighters and surrounded by businessmen. I think a very simple way of determining who gets what is to pay the winner the greater amount.....10% sounds about right? maybe even 20% more if they want to be really risky and the loser still gets shitloads. Cant wait for this fight to be inked and done already!