Charley Rose's top 10 Lightweights of all time, October, 1968

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jun 24, 2010.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007
    01 - Benny Leonard
    02 - Joe Gans
    03 - Jack Blackburn
    04 - Willie Ritchie
    05 - Freddie Welsh
    06 - Tony Canzoneri
    07 - Joe Rivers
    08 - Battling Nelson
    09 - Ad Wolgast
    10 - Leach Cross


    Thoughts on this list? Rose saw an awful lot of these guys, he was aged 82 when he tossed up these lists (he did one for ever division) and worked in boxng his whole adult life. Interesting to see Blackburn that high.
     
  2. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    57
    Oct 15, 2007
    Good list for the time, Ike Williams might have appeared though, even Beau Jack at that time in the lower section maybe? I know lists always have a bit of nostalgia about them and maybe it was too early for someone like Jack in 68 (or maybe he just doesn't make the cut), but i'd expect Williams to be in there really.

    Also, anyone want to tell me about Leach Cross? Haven't heard of him.
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    No Ike Williams? :shock::shock::shock::shock::shock::shock::shock:
     
  4. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    57
    Oct 15, 2007
    Are you ****ing kidding me? Leach Cross>Ike Williams, shows what you know.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007
    He's hugely guilty of generational bias. His #1 HW was Langford. I just wish these guys would admit a cut-off point and leave it at that. But it is interesting as to how he rates these guys relative to one another, Blackburn above Tony C for example.
     
  6. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,737
    3,589
    Jul 10, 2005
    Ross should be there some were imo.
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Why are old time historians so bias against the 1930s-1960s era? it really shows in their all time lists. Were the just in denial that boxing clearly started modernizing during this time? Perhaps they still had an emotional attachment to bareknuckle techniques that were slowly dying out.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,824
    51,914
    Mar 21, 2007

    It's just generational bias.

    When I was writing that thing about McFadden, I found a beauty of a story about Elbows where he was being interviewed by a sports magazine about boxing. He was asked how Leonard would fare with Gans. This is from memory by the way, so it may not be spot on.

    "Leonard would have no hope with Gans. Gans would toy with him. He was the greatest lightweight there's ever been."

    Had Elbows seen him boxing Jimmy Duffy? An impressive and dominant display.

    "I didn't see him fight Jimmy Duffy."

    What about Ritchie Mitchell? Surley Leonard was to be given a chance based upon this performance?

    "I didn't see him box Ritchie Mitchell."

    Well what about - Elbows holds up his hand.

    "I have never seen Benny Leonard box. I don't need to."



    These guys, they don't care!
     
  9. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,497
    3,735
    Apr 20, 2010
    Looks a lot like Nat Fleischer's list from around the same time, as all but Rivers, Blackburn and Cross are also on Fleischer's list (he had George Kid Lavigne, Lew Tendler and Owen Moran instead).

    What these two historians had in common, was a love for the pre-WW1 fighters... and a complete lack of respect for post-WW2 boxers. Some of these rankings are so absurd, that they can't really be taken seriously.
     
  10. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    475
    Oct 6, 2004
    Well Jack Blackburn had a pretty even record with the bigger Sam Langford, in about 6 fights, he also Drew fights with his share of heavy contenders, Harry Greb, Philadelphia Jack O Brien, among others. If Sam Langford is one of your top 10 heavys, then you must rate him pretty highly.

    Which fighters are you 100 per cent confident would fight on even or close to even with the above fighters? I wouldnt even be 100% certain that guys like Leonard (either of them) would necessarilly do as well. I dont rate him this highly, but it certainly isnt as absurd as you put it.
     
  11. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    57
    Oct 15, 2007
    Haha, yeah it's just generational bias, goes on today, went on then, and went on even before then. Remember the Tommy Loughran article that was posted a while back?
     
  12. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    411
    Jan 22, 2010
    TEETO , Leach Cross was the lightweight idol of the East Side of NY, before the advent of Benny Leonard, pre World War One...He was a great right hand puncher and was known for feigning being groggy and counter
    punching his opponenents as they fell into a trap...He was the ONLY boxer in history who knocked out his opponents teeth at night, and fix their teeth the next morning in his Dental Office in NY....He was named " The Fighting Dentist " aptly...Hope I gave you some info!...b.b.
     
  13. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    57
    Oct 15, 2007
    thanks for that Burt, very interesting, 'the fighting dentist', sounds legendary:good
     
  14. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,497
    3,735
    Apr 20, 2010
    When I say "absurd", I don't mean Blackburn's high placing... but the general over-population of pre-WW1 fighters in these rankings by old time historians. I'm certainly not knocking Blackburn, who undoubtedly was a great fighter.
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    Blackburn #3? Seems like a reac. But then again Rose felt Langford was the #1 all time heavyweight.